From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shinya Kuribayashi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] i2c-sh_mobile non-urgent changes Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:53:33 +0900 Message-ID: <50A5FF0D.4020502@renesas.com> References: <5087C93F.6080601@renesas.com> <20121116080704.GC8464@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20121116080704.GC8464@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: w.sang@pengutronix.de Cc: ben-linux@fluff.org, magnus.damm@gmail.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 11/16/2012 5:07 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Looks good to me, like the extensive patch descriptions. I am going to > apply it to for-next with patches 2+3 squashed, because after patch 2 we > would have a buggy state otherwise. Let me know if you are not okay with > that. It's not that buggy as you/we think, in most cases it work without problem. What's more important for me is to record the issue and how to solve it. So I'd like to have patch 2 and 3 separately. Thank you for your offer anyway, -- Shinya Kuribayashi Renesas Electronics