From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.desroches Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: at91: add of_device_id entry for at91rm9200 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:44:04 +0100 Message-ID: <51011074.1020905@atmel.com> References: <1354743732-11581-1-git-send-email-manabian@gmail.com> <20121218060232.GL23971@game.jcrosoft.org> <20130124072714.GH8364@nekote.pengutronix.de> <5100E9A4.9020804@atmel.com> <20130124101356.GA12933@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130124101356.GA12933@pengutronix.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Joachim Eastwood , nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, "ludovic.desroches" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 01/24/2013 11:13 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi, > >> I didn't add this when I did the rework because there was no DT tree >> support for RM9200. The configuration for RM9200 IP is already in >> the driver and used for non DT platform so I think it makes sense to >> add this. > > I agree. If it is usable for non-dt, it should be usable for dt. If it > makes sense is left to the user. > > Interpreted Ludovic's comment as ack and applied to -next, thanks! > Yes it is, thanks. Regards Ludovic