From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: davinci: rename "i2c_recover_bus" function
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 10:51:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515E5F74.5050505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomq6YzfftrHEnx5gqxjK8bagaRZbH=e_f2ZaRVgAspHkw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 4/4/2013 7:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 19:24, Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> As of commit 5f9296ba "i2c: Add bus recovery infrastructure", there
>> is now a global function with the same name, which clashes with
>> the davinci specific one. The obvious solution is to rename the
>> function with a davinci prefix.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org
>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>
> But i believe this stuff should be updated to use the generic recovery
> infrastructure, as it is in now.
>
> @Sekhar: Are you looking after it?
No, not in my plans ATM.
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 13:54 [PATCH] i2c: davinci: rename "i2c_recover_bus" function Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <201304041354.30024.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-04 14:07 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAKohpomq6YzfftrHEnx5gqxjK8bagaRZbH=e_f2ZaRVgAspHkw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-05 5:21 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2013-04-04 20:42 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515E5F74.5050505@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).