Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: omap: convert to module_platform_driver()

[Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>]

On 06/04/2013 09:29 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Kevin,
>> On 06/03/2013 11:59 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> The OMAP I2C driver has a relation to pinctrl-single driver. As result,
>>>> its probe will be deferred during system boot until late init time,
>>>> because the pinctrl-single is initizalized as moudle/device init time.
>>>> This, in turn, will delay initialization of all I2C devices (like mfd,
>>>> I2C regulators and etc.) and cause boot delay (more over, it can broken
>>>> initialization of drivers which are not ready to use deferred probe
>>>> mechanism yet, for example DSS).
>>>>
>>>> There are no sense to keep OMAP I2C initialization on subsys init layer
>>>> any more, hence shift it to module/device layer where the i2c <-->
>>>> pinctrl-single dependency is resolved in drivers/Makefile now.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
>>>> Cc: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>>> Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>>> Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>> Testing this patch with PATCH 1/2, the twl_rtc driver fails to correctly
>>> initialize on OMAP3:
>>>
>>>            twl_rtc rtc.22: hctosys: invalid date/time
>>>
>>> instead of the expected result:
>>>
>>>             twl_rtc rtc.22: setting system clock to 2000-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (946684800)
>>>
>>> so something is still not right for the init sequence.
>>>
>>> Kevin
>> I think, the root cause of the problem isn't this patch - it's just
>> yet another side effect
>> of using deferred probes :). I've taken a look on twl-rtc code and
>> found possible error place
>> static int __init twl_rtc_init(void)
>> {
>>      if (twl_class_is_4030()) <------ here,
>>          rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl4030_rtc_reg_map;
>>      else
>>          rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl6030_rtc_reg_map;
>>
>>      return platform_driver_register(&twl4030rtc_driver);
>> }
>> In drivers/Makefile:
>> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_LIB)        += rtc/  <------ RTC is placed before I2C
>> obj-y                += i2c/ media/ <----- and only here I2C bus
>> instantiates TWL-core device
>> and configures twl_priv->twl_id
>>
>> Thats why it's working on my OMAP4/twl6030 board. Could you check if
>> below fix will work on OMAP3:
> Yes, your fix works.  Thanks for digging into it.
>
> Care to send a proper patch?  Please be sure to send to Andrew Morton
> also, since he'll be the one to queue the RTC patch.
Hi Kevin,

The similar patch already exists:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2448251/ - [v2,1/2] RTC: rtc-twl: Fix 
rtc_reg_map initialization
from Peter Ujfalusi

-grygorii

>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> index 8751a52..aaa5015 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> @@ -469,6 +469,11 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          if (irq <= 0)
>>                  goto out1;
>>
>> +       if (twl_class_is_4030())
>> +               rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl4030_rtc_reg_map;
>> +       else
>> +               rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl6030_rtc_reg_map;
>> +
>>          ret = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rd_reg, REG_RTC_STATUS_REG);
>>          if (ret < 0)
>>                  goto out1;
>> @@ -610,11 +615,6 @@ static struct platform_driver twl4030rtc_driver = {
>>
>>   static int __init twl_rtc_init(void)
>>   {
>> -       if (twl_class_is_4030())
>> -               rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl4030_rtc_reg_map;
>> -       else
>> -               rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl6030_rtc_reg_map;
>> -
>>          return platform_driver_register(&twl4030rtc_driver);
>>   }
>>   module_init(twl_rtc_init);
>>
>> Unfortunately, I have no OMAP3 HW and can't check it.
> I suggest you find a Beagle or Gumstix/Overo type board someplace.
> There is an abundance of cheap OMAP3 hardware available.
>
> Kevin
>