From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpbg150.qq.com (smtpbg150.qq.com [18.132.163.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F26471E5018; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 09:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.132.163.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766396191; cv=none; b=WeDNIMtatL2eCFXO4YWbsiE+IRm+thRdXUd58XZ3rmW7rGk5kjtqX5QtLraJFkM9r5nHn5LlAMLBp4T+wUeTHX+x8r+QHme0zrFjD21/LyvT+g4WT0oQoBSuD0R2u8YRMvQXBHKWmKDmXlBXWUfZBAkTecyww6Af0Hj5+/BFSsI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766396191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HkhjCZrne7qQJahedWxiCLoh4aOir3xN7KC94v/fQ40=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sDUjslfdACEgn0nSvrL8rhQcQ4frsTn2eBXn4H0b+IQWAN4DePLg0zEiMPzgy4f0/CW/7W5Ob2Ht7nq5dlS9Ai0QyZ8ILliInlxxpiT5y1xZOtmWQyFhjsrnI0kqXs2Cdpz/ZtFqdLhAId2UEwUy0gdJHJ9puz+aT/lEDDZ+5Rc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.spacemit.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.spacemit.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.spacemit.com header.i=@linux.spacemit.com header.b=FeQN+0iv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.132.163.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.spacemit.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.spacemit.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.spacemit.com header.i=@linux.spacemit.com header.b="FeQN+0iv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.spacemit.com; s=mxsw2412; t=1766396164; bh=HsbEwL+a3ehQwaqo4UIyfPjDh/hFR3Gu+Q/uCtPiRcM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=FeQN+0ivvzkZvaMy2YHQO7aBztQanzf01RZheYchbmsZ3KefH6IUtP+u6gBpaEIFD oEqpS771fF0mK+wNMPJbUjfEelNpJRcixXjD4gyIAuG1AH1TTVYBXTsF46AUDD01Xk n3pP33SbV6eUGWvtOtf8Qr9sINXowTPUZ/oiMKYc= X-QQ-mid: zesmtpsz4t1766396162te0c85235 X-QQ-Originating-IP: rk4yZ8PstRgyj0RWzoU0G3baXYfMJuIshSlWznk2Z4g= Received: from = ( [120.239.196.19]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:36:00 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000 X-QQ-GoodBg: 0 X-BIZMAIL-ID: 11526639101067456687 EX-QQ-RecipientCnt: 16 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:36:00 +0800 From: Troy Mitchell To: Lee Jones , patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org, Konstantin Ryabitsev , tools@kernel.org Cc: Troy Mitchell , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, dlan@gentoo.org, elder@riscstar.com, andi.shyti@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] fix the SpacemiT P1 Kconfig and resend the K1 I2C ILCR patch. Message-ID: <5242B57B5E933BCD+aUkRAGxI5ABW-s3O@kernel.org> References: <20251118-p1-kconfig-fix-v3-0-8839c5ac5db3@linux.spacemit.com> <176613181654.3684357.18070317581817603415.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> <20251219112634.GJ9275@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20251219112634.GJ9275@google.com> X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: zesmtpsz:linux.spacemit.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz3a-0 X-QQ-XMAILINFO: Ni2ZB8mfJmbFvyCBzBMDPa3xCFaq8m8z5niqr8vjx3twsaaCO18Mq4WP XiEeMRNFHxTdb/oa3Fn3QR27dZcs4VXdxVYQB9r+kQWF2Ir2QXY3t2qKt+x/eH+Cj5OFq4e k2iwn4G2+9adPInhNAygcFdZQOMwR6kZaicOdueI83a+yIYD/+VoilPJgOnnYMd1mnBcAcv lan64mvYE2QHa4EEWP/d0H6d1Vp2cP0OoM5edMjN1LrWCMDbSAWlMOOHbiMDL5g5kNsZanl BZ7K0DN9PKb/6YIIfCeJJdbSLIYF6AMH86dZhs/oIZTwHMlXH5tb5/lAURDjRI5WefsbYfk R3xtx3SiRWvrrd6AnAWckR1bOB679F5j/SRdBB5T8ym/Z1cSu6LayU110IV8JVepL4HZ51b gKnaAN7IY229Sa+xvoOVNsUXSgJGd5UXUKPmbrzHGB3uFKjKQaQI+TwfF3LKjPhkzg7rKcx YMp8tJWY/lf+Dhq7EPhtNwEDBAbrtze4KttJxBpetXuxiOkt1nyDhI9oprbhnqmnC/bviCH QF6xOH3rlhjFH+HJSAiFB5iAca15p1/jbLCY0fO2qg3MKmUtLnhkn20LJTdH5CaWmk0G9oc PU6PRt8n8vohhOxZ2iIskf2+kPDTu+uGY4Y4x5PaO0V9SCArNPdazwvq9KnkcLpmwSlgYTn htkhp3zgQLW8FFy2o+IXUO5vxtda3IBZEVrbVVyBhOdBKM3dllIox9uuJ7eozjBlgXS3uzP PdhK+7fzz3RmXi2B5WMV/2XIKPLNEKcEnAzVpgOmI3Oumm6AH3FIbzNPLAvfJk/OGplxuhF iG5ZyvLcxahybtQrX1WOFI+Jiqps0PoAAHVness1f6qv5cHar2u+uNRHK3Tp+P95BBFys3h QFH7wo59ARAdYZqdaqSkLzPsADzinVBqFvOnkAnlUi/ZYALURzlrX+PjgeGv3CvdKhxWjJj Tby7gWczR+sy1KSJIg8DUTEukG4TJo+FdacWqg/qdJkYtw753sqOGOaw1opzeFUwgeox2sp QKKGEp2ClmyZhxrIAjKLMjxYBPsxi5DbdRKBsyfefo6AqAXcn/lhe+0cDXLEz0ZCzJD0TV4 WcguwXD2aZ2xT3kZNTH5Mt4LvOGkJ1KenvJ7nH7HYG+ X-QQ-XMRINFO: Mp0Kj//9VHAxzExpfF+O8yhSrljjwrznVg== X-QQ-RECHKSPAM: 0 On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:26:34AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > Hi Konstantin, > > > This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) > > by Alexandre Belloni : > > > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 14:08:04 +0800 you wrote: > > > Since P1 Kconfig directly selects K1_I2C, after the I2C ILCR patch was > > > merged, the driver would fail [1] when COMMON_CLK was not selected. > > > > > > This series fixes the P1 Kconfig and resends the I2C ILCR patch(This > > > patch has reverted by maintainer [2]). > > > > > > Now, P1 Kconfig patch has been merged[3], so I2C ILCR patch can be > > > merged as well. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Here is the summary with links: > > - [v3,1/4] i2c: spacemit: configure ILCR for accurate SCL frequency > > (no matching commit) > > - [v3,2/4] rtc: spacemit: MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 as dependencies > > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/16bd954c9336 > > - [v3,3/4] regulator: spacemit: MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 as dependencies > > (no matching commit) > > > - [v3,4/4] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: add default value > > (no matching commit) > > I was just about to send another snot-o-gram about people picking up > patches without the correct Acks, but I just realised this is the same > Patchwork issue we spoke about a couple of weeks ago. > > This formatting is very confusing, since at first blush it looks as > though the whole patch-set was applied. > > Please can we only list patches that were merged? I agree. At first glance, I also thought the entire series was applied. - Troy > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯] >