From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime COQUELIN Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add I2C support to ST SoCs Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:33:43 +0200 Message-ID: <5256ACB7.7050302@st.com> References: <1381250576-7916-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com> <525675B6.4080404@st.com> <20131010100354.GE2638@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131010100354.GE2638@katana> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Srinivas KANDAGATLA , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Rob Landley , Russell King , Grant Likely , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen GALLIMORE , Stuart MENEFY , Lee Jones , Gabriel FERNANDEZ List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 10/10/2013 12:03 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>> Changes since v3: >>> - Switch back to vendor specific DT properties regarding the anti-glitch >>> filter configuration, as this IP is the only one having such a filter. >> Do you agree to keep these properties vendor-specifics? > My preference is generic bindings. There are no other users right now, > yet there might be in the future. At least with something similar enough > that the bindings will apply. Was hoping for some additional input, > though, but I am not depending on it. I have to push another revision to change the IRQ flags as reported by Stephen G. I will also revert to generic bindings in this revision. For their documentation, I will add it as soon as you will have created the DT binding documentation of I2C. Is it okay for you? > >> If so, could you take this series for v3.13? > Sure, if it passes the second review... For sure! Regards, Maxime