From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lan Tianyu Subject: Re: [Patch V2 6/9] I2C: Add smbus word/block process call helper function Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:23:29 +0800 Message-ID: <5379CD91.2080709@intel.com> References: <1398147855-9868-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> <1398695268-28645-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> <1398695268-28645-7-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> <20140517102110.GB2602@katana> <53776B32.8010400@intel.com> <20140517171759.GB2597@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140517171759.GB2597@katana> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, awilliam@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 05/18/2014 01:17 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >>> BTW what were your test scenarios for these functions and smbus quick? >>> >> >> From ACPI spec, Read/Write quick and Word/Block process call >> protocol will be used by Bios ACPI code. But so far, I don't find >> such machines. So these functions has not been tested. > > Uh oh, I have some trouble adding untested code. Can't we add until we > have a user to verify it? Ok. I will remove these patches from this patchset since currently there are no users. > > BTW I have to review the other patches later, so please wait before > resending the series. >