From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "i2c: rcar: remove spinlock" Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:35:44 +0400 Message-ID: <53FB1F90.6080704@cogentembedded.com> References: <1642788.pEhrsPDp4u@wasted.cogentembedded.com> <20140824064520.GA2578@katana> <53F9CCE7.3010006@cogentembedded.com> <20140825034009.GA2795@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140825034009.GA2795@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 8/25/2014 7:40 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> You told me to do 2 patches, one of them just revert. > No no, I asked for one patch having both, see: "... feel free to send > one patch with the revert and the updates you mentioned." Ah, I misunderstood you. However, I don't quite understand why you want to combine revert and the mentioned updates... > Thanks, > Wolfram WBR, Sergei