From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: addy ke Subject: Re: About RK3288 i2c scl duty cycle Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:26:27 +0800 Message-ID: <541A34C3.6000400@rock-chips.com> References: <2014091709302172205233@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Cc: max.schwarz-BGeptl67XyCzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org, heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org, wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org, huangtao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org, cf-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.orglinux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Add public list On 2014/9/17 23:17, Doug Anderson wrote: > Addy, >=20 > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:30 PM, addy.ke-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org > wrote: >> hi, all >=20 > Any reason why you didn't add some public lists? It seems like this > is a perfect discussion for linux-i2c. >=20 >=20 >> According to i2c-bus specification(version2.1, page 32, Table5, FAST= -MODE): >> The minimum LOW period of the scl clock is <1.3us>, and the minimum = HIGH >> period of the scl clock is <0.6us>. >> T(min_low) : T(min_high) ~=3D 2 : 1 >> >> If in fast mode(scl rate =3D 400Khz) >> 1=EF=BC=89Under ideal conditions, T(scl_low) =3D T(scl_high) =3D <1.= 25us> >> 2=EF=BC=89Our measurement, T(scl_low) =3D <1.3us>, T(scl_high) =3D <= 1.25us> >> >> The low period of the scl clock is critical. >> >> Do we need set to increase T(scl_low)? // T= (scl_low ) >> : T(scl_High) =3D 2 : 1 >=20 > I can't say I've ever looked at that pat of the i2c spec before, but > what you say seems reasonable to me. ...well for 400kHz, at least. > At 100kHz you shouldn't use the same 2:1 ratio. Yes, in normal-mode(100K) we can be only used 1:1 ratio. But in FAST-MODE maybe we must use 2:1 ratio. ---- In Table 5(Characteristics of the SDA and SCL bus lines for F/S-mode I2= C-bus devices) 1)FAST-MODE(400K): The minimum LOW period of the scl clock 1.3us the minimum HIGH period of the scl clock 0.6us T(min_low) : T(min_high) ~=3D 2 : 1 But I can't see any ratio about In FAST-mode(400k) and Normal-mode(10= 0k). 2)Normal-MODE(100K): The minimum LOW period of the scl clock 4.7us the minimum HIGH period of the scl clock 4.0us T(min_low) : T(min_high) ~=3D 1 : 1 3) HS-mode(3.4M) ratio of 1 to 2 is required, decribed as follows: Hs-mode master devices generate a serial clock signal with a HIGH to = LOW ratio of 1 to 2 >=20 > I'm sure other drivers have solved this problem too, so maybe you can > copy some code. In i2c-designware-core.c you can see them doing all > the calculations you need, I think. >=20 >=20 > -Doug >=20 >=20 >=20