From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grygorii Strashko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] i2c: davinci: use ICPFUNC to toggle I2C as gpio for bus recovery Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: <5476085B.40009@ti.com> References: <1417010393-30598-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <1417010393-30598-6-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20141126160407.GN4431@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141126160407.GN4431-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?windows-1252?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Wolfram Sang , Sekhar Nori , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mike Looijmans , Kevin Hilman , Santosh Shilimkar , Murali Karicheri , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear >> that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on >> some boards, because on regular boards, this will only toggle GPIO >> lines that aren't muxed to the actual pins. >> >> The I2C controller on SoCs like da850 (and da830), Keystone 2 has th= e >> built-in capability to bit-bang its lines by using the ICPFUNC regis= ters >> of the i2c controller. >> Implement the suggested procedure by toggling SCL and checking SDA u= sing >> the ICPFUNC registers of the I2C controller when present. Allow plat= forms >> to indicate the presence of the ICPFUNC registers with a has_pfunc p= latform >> data flag and add optional DT property "ti,has-pfunc" to indicate >> the same in DT. > On what does it depend if this pfunc stuff works or not? Only the SoC= , > or also on some board specific properties? SoC / set of SoCs. Also, similar feature is supported by OMAP and AM335= x/AM437x SoCs using I2C_SYSTEST register. > Given the former using the > compatible string to detect its availability would be better. (In thi= s > case also sorry, didn't consider this case when requesting the proper= ty > in the last round.) >=20 > The patch looks ok. regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html