From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom: at24: Add support for large EEPROMs connected to SMBus adapters Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 07:37:10 -0800 Message-ID: <54E20EA6.4060504@roeck-us.net> References: <1423067017-27607-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20150204174723.GB30930@katana> <20150204190819.GA15467@roeck-us.net> <20150204233516.GA1677@katana> <20150205002630.GA396@roeck-us.net> <20150205144028.GA4865@katana> <20150205175326.GA26691@roeck-us.net> <20150212040126.GA1691@roeck-us.net> <20150216120951.GA2840@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150216120951.GA2840@katana> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 02/16/2015 04:09 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Guenter, > >> I wonder where we are with thisp patch; I don't recall a reply to my previous >> e-mail. > > Sorry for the late reply. I needed to recover from a HDD headcrash :( > >> Do you need some more time to think about it ? Otherwise I'll publish an >> out-of-tree version of the at24 driver with the patch applied on github, >> for those who might need the functionality provided by this patch. > > Your last mail made me aware of why we were missing each other before. I > see your point now, but yes, still need to think about it. My plan is to > have a decision until the 3.21 merge window. > Ok, fair enough. Thanks, Guenter