From: Ray Jui <rjui-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
gregory.0xf0-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
"Jayachandran C
<jchandra-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>;
bcm-kernel-feedback-list"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [V2 1/2] i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:39:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552D7AF5.7040005@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150414134740.GB1375@katana>
Hi Kamal,
+ bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On 4/14/2015 6:47 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:01:05PM -0400, Kamal Dasu wrote:
>> Adding support for i2c controller driver for Broadcom settop
>> SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Wow, this is the third I2C master driver coming from Broadcom in a
> pretty short time. May I ask the authors of the previous Broadcom
> drivers (CCed) to do the initial review?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wolfram
>
>> ---
>> V2 changes
>> - Separate commits for device tree bindings and
>> initial i2c-brcmstb driver code
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c | 703 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 714 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> index 22da9c2..e3938f4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> @@ -392,6 +392,16 @@ config I2C_BCM_KONA
>>
>> If you do not need KONA I2C interface, say N.
>>
>> +config I2C_BRCMSTB
>> + tristate "BRCM Settop I2C adapter"
>> + depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB
Would be nice to add dependency on COMPILE_TEST if you don't mind?
>> + default y
>> + help
>> + If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
>> + I2C interface on the Broadcom Settop SoCs.
>> +
>> + If you do not need I2C interface, say N.
>> +
>> config I2C_BLACKFIN_TWI
>> tristate "Blackfin TWI I2C support"
>> depends on BLACKFIN
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> index 3638feb..91a0b5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_VIPERBOARD) += i2c-viperboard.o
>> # Other I2C/SMBus bus drivers
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ACORN) += i2c-acorn.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BCM_KONA) += i2c-bcm-kona.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BRCMSTB) += i2c-brcmstb.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL) += i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ELEKTOR) += i2c-elektor.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OPAL) += i2c-opal.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b69ab14
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,703 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Broadcom Corporation
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
>> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
>> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/version.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
Wolfram would prefer the includes to be sorted in alphabetic order
>> +
>> +#define N_DATA_REGS 8
>> +#define N_DATA_BYTES (N_DATA_REGS * 4)
>> +
>> +/* BSC count register field definitions */
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG1_MASK 0x0000003f
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG1_SHIFT 0
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG2_MASK 0x00000fc0
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG2_SHIFT 6
>> +
>> +/* BSC CTL register field definitions */
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_DTF_MASK 0x00000003
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_MASK 0x00000030
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT 4
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK 0x00000040
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_SHIFT 6
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK 0x00000080
>> +
>> +/* BSC_IIC_ENABLE r/w enable and interrupt field defintions */
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_RESTART_MASK 0x00000040
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTART_MASK 0x00000020
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTOP_MASK 0x00000010
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_NOACK_MASK 0x00000004
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_INTRP_MASK 0x00000002
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_ENABLE_MASK 0x00000001
>> +
>> +/* BSC_CTLHI control register field definitions */
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_INPUT_SWITCHING_LEVEL_MASK 0x00000080
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_DATAREG_SIZE_MASK 0x00000040
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_IGNORE_ACK_MASK 0x00000002
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_WAIT_DIS_MASK 0x00000001
>> +
>> +#define I2C_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */
>> +
>> +/* Condition mask used for non combined transfer */
>> +#define COND_RESTART BSC_IIC_EN_RESTART_MASK
>> +#define COND_NOSTART BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTART_MASK
>> +#define COND_NOSTOP BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTOP_MASK
Is the tab above expected?
>> +#define COND_START_STOP (COND_RESTART | COND_NOSTART | COND_NOSTOP)
>> +
>> +/* BSC data transfer direction */
>> +#define DTF_WR_MASK 0x00000000
>> +#define DTF_RD_MASK 0x00000001
>> +/* BSC data transfer direction combined format */
>> +#define DTF_RD_WR_MASK 0x00000002
>> +#define DTF_WR_RD_MASK 0x00000003
>> +/* default bus speed */
>> +#define DEFAULT_BUS_SPEEDHZ 375000
>> +
>> +struct bsc_regs {
>> + u32 chip_address;
>> + u32 data_in[N_DATA_REGS];
>> + u32 cnt_reg;
>> + u32 ctl_reg;
>> + u32 iic_enable;
>> + u32 data_out[N_DATA_REGS];
>> + u32 ctlhi_reg;
>> + u32 scl_param;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct bsc_clk_param {
>> + u32 hz;
>> + u32 scl_mask;
>> + u32 div_mask;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum bsc_xfer_cmd {
>> + CMD_WR,
>> + CMD_RD,
>> + CMD_WR_NOACK,
>> + CMD_RD_NOACK,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static char const *cmd_string[] = {
>> + [CMD_WR] = "WR",
>> + [CMD_RD] = "RD",
>> + [CMD_WR_NOACK] = "WR NOACK",
>> + [CMD_RD_NOACK] = "RD NOACK",
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum bus_speeds {
>> + SPD_375K,
>> + SPD_390K,
>> + SPD_187K,
>> + SPD_200K,
>> + SPD_93K,
>> + SPD_97K,
>> + SPD_46K,
>> + SPD_50K
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct bsc_clk_param bsc_clk[] = {
two spaces before bsc_clk
>> + [SPD_375K] = {
>> + .hz = 375000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_375K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_390K] = {
>> + .hz = 390000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_390K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_187K] = {
>> + .hz = 187500,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_187K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_200K] = {
>> + .hz = 200000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_200K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_93K] = {
>> + .hz = 93750,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_375K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + },
>> + [SPD_97K] = {
>> + .hz = 97500,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_390K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + },
>> + [SPD_46K] = {
>> + .hz = 46875,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_187K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + },
>> + [SPD_50K] = {
>> + .hz = 50000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_200K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct brcmstb_i2c_dev {
>> + struct device *device;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + void __iomem *irq_base;
>> + int irq;
>> + struct bsc_regs *bsc_regmap;
>> + struct i2c_adapter adapter;
>> + struct completion done;
>> + bool is_suspended;
>> + u32 clk_freq_hz;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define bsc_readl(_dev, reg) \
>> + __bsc_readl(_dev, offsetof(struct bsc_regs, reg))
>> +
>> +#define bsc_writel(_dev, val, reg) \
>> + __bsc_writel(_dev, val, offsetof(struct bsc_regs, reg))
>> +
>> +static inline u32 __bsc_readl(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + return __raw_readl(dev->base + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void __bsc_writel(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev, u32 val,
>> + u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + __raw_writel(val, dev->base + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + /* Disable BSC CTL interrupt line */
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg &= ~BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK;
What is the purpose of dev->bsc_regmap? For storing cached masked value
of some registers?
>> + barrier();
What is the purpose of the above barrier? Same question applies to all
other places
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg, ctl_reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_enable_irq(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + /* Enable BSC CTL interrupt line */
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg |= BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK;
>> + barrier();
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg, ctl_reg);
>> +}
You should consider combining brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq and
brcmstb_i2c_enable_irq since they access the same register.
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t brcmstb_i2c_isr(int irq, void *devid)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev = devid;
>> + u32 status_bsc_ctl = bsc_readl(dev, ctl_reg);
>> + u32 status_iic_intrp = bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable);
What is the purpose of status_iic_intrp? It's not used any where in the
ISR except the debugging prints.
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "isr CTL_REG %x IIC_EN %x\n",
>> + status_bsc_ctl, status_iic_intrp);
>> +
>> + if (!(status_bsc_ctl & BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK))
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> +
>> + brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(dev);
>> + complete_all(&dev->done);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "isr handled");
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Wait for device to be ready */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_wait_if_busy(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(I2C_TIMEOUT);
>> +
>> + while ((bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable) & BSC_IIC_EN_INTRP_MASK)) {
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> + dev_err(dev->device, "i2c device busy timeout\n");
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
>> + }
In the worst case, the above loop busy waiting for 100 msec? Consider
adding a cpu_relax call to make it more efficient.
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* i2c xfer completion function, handles both irq and polling mode
>> + */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_waitforcompletion(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(I2C_TIMEOUT);
>> +
>> + if (dev->irq >= 0) {
irq = 0 is not a valid line?
>> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->done, timeout))
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + } else {
>> + /* we are in polling mode */
>> + u32 bsc_intrp;
>> + unsigned long time_left = jiffies + timeout;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + bsc_intrp = bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable) &
>> + BSC_IIC_EN_INTRP_MASK;
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, time_left)) {
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + udelay(100);
>> + } while (!bsc_intrp);
Again, with the use of udelay, this is still busy waiting for 100 msec
in the worst case.
>> + brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(dev);
Why is irq disabled called in the case of polling mode but not irq mode?
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Set xfer START/STOP conditions for subsequent transfer */
>> +static void brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + u32 cond_flag)
>> +{
>> + u32 regval = dev->bsc_regmap->iic_enable;
>> +
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->iic_enable = (regval & ~COND_START_STOP) | cond_flag;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Send I2C request */
>> +static int brcmstb_send_i2c_cmd(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd)
>> +{
>> + int rc = 0, ignore_ack = 0;
ignore_ack should be a bool
>> + struct bsc_regs *pi2creg = dev->bsc_regmap;
>> + u32 ctl_reg;
>> +
>> + /* Make sure the hardware is ready */
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_wait_if_busy(dev);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "%s, %d\n", __func__, cmd);
>> +
>> + /* see if the transaction needs check NACK conditions */
>> + ignore_ack = (cmd == CMD_WR || cmd == CMD_RD) ? 0 : 1;
>> + if (ignore_ack)
>> + pi2creg->ctlhi_reg |= BSC_CTLHI_REG_IGNORE_ACK_MASK;
>> + else
>> + pi2creg->ctlhi_reg &= ~BSC_CTLHI_REG_IGNORE_ACK_MASK;
>> + bsc_writel(dev, pi2creg->ctlhi_reg, ctlhi_reg);
>> +
>> + if (dev->irq >= 0)
>> + reinit_completion(&dev->done);
>> +
>> + /* set data transfer direction */
>> + ctl_reg = pi2creg->ctl_reg & ~BSC_CTL_REG_DTF_MASK;
>> + if (cmd == CMD_WR || cmd == CMD_WR_NOACK)
>> + pi2creg->ctl_reg = ctl_reg | DTF_WR_MASK;
>> + else
>> + pi2creg->ctl_reg = ctl_reg | DTF_RD_MASK;
>> +
>> + /* enable BSC CTL interrupt line */
>> + brcmstb_i2c_enable_irq(dev);
>> +
>> + /* initiate transfer by setting iic_enable */
>> + pi2creg->iic_enable |= BSC_IIC_EN_ENABLE_MASK;
>> + bsc_writel(dev, pi2creg->iic_enable, iic_enable);
>> +
So you only disable the interrupt in the ISR. If the ISR is never fired
for whatever reason, then the interrupt is kept enabled.
A better way to handle this would be to disable the interrupt after
brcmstb_i2c_waitforcompletion (in either sucess or failure case), so
it's consistent that the interrupt always gets disabled after you come
out of this function.
>> + /* Wait for transaction to finish or timeout */
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_waitforcompletion(dev);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + dev_err(dev->device, "intr timeout for cmd %s\n",
>> + cmd_string[cmd]);
>> + goto cmd_out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!ignore_ack && bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable) & BSC_IIC_EN_NOACK_MASK) {
>> + rc = -EREMOTEIO;
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "controller received NOACK intr for %s\n",
>> + cmd_string[cmd]);
>> + }
>> +
>> +cmd_out:
>> + bsc_writel(dev, 0, cnt_reg);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, 0, iic_enable);
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_xfer_bsc_data(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + u8 *buf, unsigned int len,
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd)
>> +{
>> + int i, j, rc;
>> +
>> + /* set the read/write length */
>> + bsc_writel(dev, BSC_CNT_REG1_MASK & (len << BSC_CNT_REG1_SHIFT),
>> + cnt_reg);
What is the max len that can be supported? BSC_CNT_REG1_MASK = 63? Then
you should check against that.
Note Wolfram has introduced a way to validate the supported data length
at the i2c-core, which you should adapt:
commit b7f625840267b18ef1011cba0085bb7e237d76f7
Author: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon Jan 5 23:45:59 2015 +0100
i2c: add quirk checks to core
Let the core do the checks if HW quirks prevent a transfer. Saves code
from drivers and adds consistency.
>> +
>> + /* Write data into data_in register */
>> + if (cmd == CMD_WR || cmd == CMD_WR_NOACK) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
>> + u32 word = 0;
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
>> + word >>= 8;
>> + if ((i + j) < len)
>> + word |= buf[i + j] << 24;
>> + }
>> + bsc_writel(dev, word, data_in[i >> 2]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Initiate xfer */
>> + rc = brcmstb_send_i2c_cmd(dev, cmd);
>> +
>> + if (rc != 0)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + if (cmd == CMD_RD || cmd == CMD_RD_NOACK) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
>> + u32 data = bsc_readl(dev, data_out[i >> 2]);
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < 4 && (j + i) < len; j++) {
>> + buf[i + j] = data & 0xff;
>> + data >>= 8;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Write a single byte of data to the i2c bus */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_write_data_byte(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + u8 *buf, unsigned int nak_expected)
>> +{
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd = nak_expected ? CMD_WR : CMD_WR_NOACK;
>> +
>> + bsc_writel(dev, 1, cnt_reg);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, *buf, data_in);
>> +
>> + return brcmstb_send_i2c_cmd(dev, cmd);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Send i2c address */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_do_addr(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + struct i2c_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + unsigned char addr;
>> +
>> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN) {
>> +
redundant space
>> + /* First byte is 11110XX0 where XX is upper 2 bits */
>> + addr = 0xF0 | ((msg->addr & 0x300) >> 7);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, addr, chip_address);
>> +
>> + /* Second byte is the remaining 8 bits */
>> + addr = msg->addr & 0xFF;
>> + if (brcmstb_i2c_write_data_byte(dev, &addr, 0) < 0)
>> + return -EREMOTEIO;
>> +
>> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
>> + /* For read, send restart without stop condition */
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev, COND_RESTART
>> + | COND_NOSTOP);
>> + /* Then re-send the first byte with the read bit set */
>> + addr = 0xF0 | ((msg->addr & 0x300) >> 7) | 0x01;
>> + if (brcmstb_i2c_write_data_byte(dev, &addr, 0) < 0)
>> + return -EREMOTEIO;
>> +
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + addr = msg->addr << 1;
>> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
>> + addr |= 1;
>> +
>> + bsc_writel(dev, addr, chip_address);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Master transfer function */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
>> + struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adapter);
>> + struct i2c_msg *pmsg;
>> + int rc = 0;
>> + int i;
>> + int bytes_to_xfer;
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd;
>> + u8 *tmp_buf;
>> + int len = 0;
>> + int ignore_nack = 0;
>> +
>> + if (dev->is_suspended)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + /* Loop through all messages */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>> + pmsg = &msgs[i];
>> + len = pmsg->len;
>> + tmp_buf = pmsg->buf;
>> + ignore_nack = pmsg->flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device,
>> + "msg# %d/%d flg %x buf %x len %d\n", i,
>> + num - 1, pmsg->flags,
>> + pmsg->buf ? pmsg->buf[0] : '0', pmsg->len);
>> +
>> + if (i < (num - 1) && (msgs[i + 1].flags & I2C_M_NOSTART))
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev, ~(COND_START_STOP));
>> + else
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev,
>> + COND_RESTART | COND_NOSTOP);
>> +
>> + /* Send slave address */
>> + if (!(pmsg->flags & I2C_M_NOSTART)) {
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_do_addr(dev, pmsg);
>> + if (rc < 0) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device,
>> + "NACK for addr %2.2x msg#%d rc = %d\n",
>> + pmsg->addr, i, rc);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + cmd = (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? CMD_RD : CMD_WR;
>> +
>> + /* Perform data transfer */
>> + while (len) {
>> + bytes_to_xfer = min(len, N_DATA_BYTES);
>> +
>> + if (ignore_nack || len <= N_DATA_BYTES)
>> + cmd = (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? CMD_RD_NOACK
>> + : CMD_WR_NOACK;
>> +
>> + if (len <= N_DATA_BYTES && i == (num - 1))
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev,
>> + ~(COND_START_STOP));
>> +
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_xfer_bsc_data(dev, tmp_buf,
>> + bytes_to_xfer, cmd);
>> + if (rc < 0) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "%s failure",
>> + cmd_string[cmd]);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + len -= bytes_to_xfer;
>> + tmp_buf += bytes_to_xfer;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc = num;
>> +out:
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 brcmstb_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>> +{
>> + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL | I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR
>> + | I2C_FUNC_NOSTART | I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct i2c_algorithm brcmstb_i2c_algo = {
>> + .master_xfer = brcmstb_i2c_xfer,
>> + .functionality = brcmstb_i2c_functionality,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_set_bus_speed(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int i = 0, num_speeds = ARRAY_SIZE(bsc_clk);
>> + u32 clk_freq_hz = dev->clk_freq_hz;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_speeds; i++) {
>> + if (bsc_clk[i].hz == clk_freq_hz) {
So you only allow an exact rate match? I think a round down of the rate
when not exactly matched might be sufficient?
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg &= ~(BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_MASK
>> + | BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK);
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg |= (bsc_clk[i].scl_mask |
>> + bsc_clk[i].div_mask);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg, ctl_reg);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i == num_speeds) {
>> + i = (bsc_readl(dev, ctl_reg) & BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_MASK) >>
>> + BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT;
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "invalid input clock-frequency %dHz\n",
>> + clk_freq_hz);
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "leaving current clock-frequency @ %dHz\n",
>> + bsc_clk[i].hz);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_set_bsc_reg_defaults(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + /* 4 byte data register */
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctlhi_reg = BSC_CTLHI_REG_DATAREG_SIZE_MASK;
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctlhi_reg, ctlhi_reg);
>> + /* set bus speed */
>> + brcmstb_i2c_set_bus_speed(dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int rc = 0;
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev;
>> + struct i2c_adapter *adap;
>> + struct resource *iomem;
>> + const char *int_name;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate memory for private data structure */
>> + dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dev)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + dev->bsc_regmap = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bsc_regs), GFP_KERNEL);
why can't you use devm_kzalloc here?
>> + if (!dev->bsc_regmap)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
>> + dev->device = &pdev->dev;
>> + init_completion(&dev->done);
>> +
>> + /* Map hardware registers */
>> + iomem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + dev->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev->device, iomem);
>> + if (IS_ERR(dev->base)) {
>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto probe_errorout;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc = of_property_read_string(dev->device->of_node, "interrupt-names",
>> + &int_name);
Why do you need a specific DT property to specify the interrupt name?
Why can't you simply set it to pdev->name?
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + int_name = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* Get the interrupt number */
>> + dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
No error checking? I guess you rely on devm_request_irq below to do it?
That's probably fine.
>> +
>> + /* disable the bsc interrupt line */
>> + brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(dev);
>> +
>> + /* register the ISR handler */
>> + rc = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, dev->irq, brcmstb_i2c_isr,
>> + IRQF_SHARED,
>> + int_name ? int_name : pdev->name,
>> + dev);
>> +
>> + if (rc) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "falling back to polling mode");
>> + dev->irq = -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Add the i2c adapter */
>> + adap = &dev->adapter;
>> + i2c_set_adapdata(adap, dev);
>> + adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
Not needed...
>> + strlcpy(adap->name, "Broadcom STB : ", sizeof(adap->name));
>> + if (int_name)
>> + strlcat(adap->name, int_name, sizeof(adap->name));
>> + adap->algo = &brcmstb_i2c_algo;
>> + adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> + adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + rc = i2c_add_adapter(adap);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + dev_err(dev->device, "failed to add adapter\n");
>> + goto probe_errorout;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->device->of_node,
>> + "clock-frequency", &dev->clk_freq_hz)) {
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "missing clock-frequency property\n");
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "setting default clock-frequency %dHz\n",
>> + bsc_clk[0].hz);
>> + dev->clk_freq_hz = bsc_clk[0].hz;
>> + }
>> +
>> + brcmstb_i2c_set_bsc_reg_defaults(dev);
Don't you want to do this before calling i2c_add_adapter?
>> + dev_info(dev->device, "%s@%dhz registered in %s mode\n",
>> + int_name ? int_name : " ", dev->clk_freq_hz,
>> + (dev->irq >= 0) ? "interrupt" : "polling");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +probe_errorout:
>> + kfree(dev->bsc_regmap);
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + kfree(dev->bsc_regmap);
>> + i2c_del_adapter(&dev->adapter);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + i2c_lock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> + i2c_dev->is_suspended = true;
>> + i2c_unlock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + i2c_lock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> + brcmstb_i2c_set_bsc_reg_defaults(i2c_dev);
The BSC registers might be reset coming out of deep sleep?
>> + i2c_dev->is_suspended = false;
>> + i2c_unlock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_i2c_pm, brcmstb_i2c_suspend,
>> + brcmstb_i2c_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id brcmstb_i2c_of_match[] = {
>> + {.compatible = "brcm,brcmstb-i2c"},
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, brcmstb_i2c_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver brcmstb_i2c_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "brcmstb-i2c",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .of_match_table = brcmstb_i2c_of_match,
>> + .pm = &brcmstb_i2c_pm,
>> + },
>> + .probe = brcmstb_i2c_probe,
>> + .remove = brcmstb_i2c_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(brcmstb_i2c_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kamal Dasu <kdasu-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Broadcom Settop I2C Driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> --
>> 2.3.2
Thanks,
Ray
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-02 20:01 [V2 1/2] i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver Kamal Dasu
[not found] ` <1428004866-13543-1-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-02 20:01 ` [V2 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add i2c-brcmstb dt bindings Kamal Dasu
2015-04-14 13:47 ` [V2 1/2] i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver Wolfram Sang
2015-04-14 20:39 ` Ray Jui [this message]
[not found] ` <552D7AF5.7040005-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 7:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-15 7:51 ` Ray Jui
2015-04-16 15:32 ` Kamal Dasu
2015-04-15 7:21 ` rajeev kumar
[not found] ` <CAA7nrtjWUZOBQiTr0YrZFmLOoAttyJ5gMxb+hR7jnz1HC51Buw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 7:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-16 16:10 ` Kamal Dasu
[not found] ` <CAC=U0a3OXKBSUeRnbsXZ2J7snhRzhGAFctvzjwg=o90w59oNHg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-17 5:52 ` rajeev kumar
[not found] ` <CAA7nrtjyVXkMYTL8AWMMp1peZ0TGMwYtYhRxrTrBH3kyZzi1tw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-17 6:56 ` rajeev kumar
2015-04-17 17:12 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552D7AF5.7040005@broadcom.com \
--to=rjui-dy08kvg/lbpwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregory.0xf0-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).