From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Remove needless structure member zero initialization
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:10:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5552EAD4.7070806@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150512190348.GA4449-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
On 05/12/2015 10:03 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:44:36PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>> No need to clear one struct i2c_client member variable since memset has
>> already cleared all of them. Remove also one space intendation from err
>> label.
>
> Ehrm, why change this now when you remove the code block in the next
> patch anyhow? :)
>
Actually second patch is not removing any other code blocks than memset
so my 2 seconds thinking said lets put that client.flags = 0; removal to
another patch especially after finding the err label indentation, i.e.
spring cleanings first and then the actual patch :-)
> Also, the indentation thing is very likely intentional. Sadly, I can't
> remember why at this moment, but I remember that when I tried to grep
> something I understood why some people put a space in front of labels
>
Probably it makes code look better in some cases when there are multiple
labels but here it didn't look consistent with the rest of the file.
I don't mind squashing this into second patch or keep them separate. I'd
like to resend anyway because I noticed s/intendation/indentation/
misspelling in the commit log here.
--
Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 12:44 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Remove needless structure member zero initialization Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1430311477-21759-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-29 12:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: core: Reduce stack size of acpi_i2c_space_handler() Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1430311477-21759-2-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-12 19:05 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20150512190505.GB4449-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-13 6:58 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <20150513065812.GB1490-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1432129012-26648-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-02 15:29 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Remove needless structure member zero initialization Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20150512190348.GA4449-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-13 6:10 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5552EAD4.7070806@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).