From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 1/2] i2c: tegra: update CONFIG_LOAD for new conifiguration Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:10:24 +0530 Message-ID: <559E0948.1050004@nvidia.com> References: <1435661667-11554-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <559D89D8.50500@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <559D89D8.50500-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren , wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org Cc: thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, andrewc-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Chaitanya Bandi List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 09 July 2015 02:06 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/30/2015 04:54 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan >> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Bandi > > I'm not sure why Chaitanya's S-o-b is there and listed last if he's > not the patch author. If he wrote the patch, he should be the git > author and his S-o-b should be first. If he didn't and you simply > based this patch on work by Chaitanya, then his S-o-b probably > shouldn't be present, and yours would be last since you're submitting > the patch. The patch I created is based on Chaitanya's work, edited on his work to match with mainline. > >> --- >> Stephen/Andrew, >> I need help on testing this on other platform. I tested this on T210. > > I'm puzzled how this was tested on T210, since it isn't supported > upstream yet. We tested this as: - K318 kernel release + i2c subsystem from linux-next in downstream boards. - Chrome-OS team on smaug with their tree. > The series, > Tested-by: Stephen Warren Thanks for testing.