From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Zapolskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:51:54 +0300 Message-ID: <55C5FB6A.5010300@mleia.com> References: <1437945502-27944-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> <20150807161055.GD25357@katana> <55C4D9B2.3000708@mleia.com> <20150807223456.GA1527@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150807223456.GA1527@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Maxime Ripard , Jean Delvare , Ian Munsie , Michael Neuling , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On 08.08.2015 01:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in >> your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next: > > Those are already in linus tree. I mean all drivers which use struct > i2c_driver. Or do you prefer they go via Greg? I am fine with both. > I think you may find most of the changes applied by Greg into misc/char-misc-next branch. The only change from the series, which is not found in misc/char-misc-next or i2c/for-next is related to at25 driver (IC is sitting on SPI): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/26/101 Change 8/8 for sunxi is outdated due to accepted NVMEM framework. With best wishes, Vladimir