From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: fix potential race in i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 08:05:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55e8de0d-daf3-f398-0fc2-357b53c14bc8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230905225922.blulveq5qwe7tv6h@zenone.zhora.eu>
On 06.09.2023 00:59, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Heiner,
>
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 01:35:10PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 05.09.2023 11:11, Andi Shyti wrote:
>>> Hi Jean,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2023 22:10:52 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>>> Currently we set SMBHSTCNT_LAST_BYTE only after the host has started
>>>>> receiving the last byte. If we get e.g. preempted before setting
>>>>> SMBHSTCNT_LAST_BYTE, the host may be finished with receiving the byte
>>>>> before SMBHSTCNT_LAST_BYTE is set.
>>>>> Therefore change the code to set SMBHSTCNT_LAST_BYTE before writing
>>>>> SMBHSTSTS_BYTE_DONE for the byte before the last byte. Now the code
>>>>> is also consistent with what we do in i801_isr_byte_done().
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>
>>>>
>>>> Note for Wolfram: checkpatch says we should insert here:
>>>>
>>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230828152747.09444625@endymion.delvare/
>>>
>>> does this also need a Fixes: tag? I tried to check it, but there
>>> was an intricate jungle of commits in these lines.
>>>
>> Quoting Jean from previous communication about this patch:
>> As far as I see, the race condition already existed when the kernel
>> switched to git, so there's no point in having a Fixes statement.
>
> true... I forgot about this comment.
>
> Anyway I think that this should, then, go to all the stable
> kernels and I believe that without the Fixes tag this will never
> be picked up.
>
Then we may have to set the Fixes tag to the following?
1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Plus a comment that the issue existed before already.
> Maybe Greg can advise here.
>
I *think* Greg (or a bot of him) would complain when receiving
something for stable w/o a Fixes tag.
> Would you mind resending this patch Cc'eing the stable kernel and
> adding a note after the '---'?
>
OK
> Andi
>
>>> Anyway, you can add:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andi
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-02 20:10 [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: fix potential race in i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte Heiner Kallweit
2023-09-05 8:12 ` Jean Delvare
2023-09-05 9:11 ` Andi Shyti
2023-09-05 11:35 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-09-05 22:59 ` Andi Shyti
2023-09-06 6:05 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2023-09-06 8:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-09-06 8:07 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55e8de0d-daf3-f398-0fc2-357b53c14bc8@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox