linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
To: EXT Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: davinci: Increase module clock frequency
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:00:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <565C566C.7000809@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151130135504.GE1513@katana>

Hi!

On 30.11.2015 14:55, EXT Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>  	/* get minimum of 7 MHz clock, but max of 12 MHz */
>> > -	psc = (input_clock / 7000000) - 1;
>> > +	psc = (input_clock / 12000000) - 1;
> Doesn't make this the above comment invalid?

The comment refers to datasheet, not really to the code. And eventual changes to the datasheet
that's what can make it invalid (though I don't know TI's plans on it). Nevertheless, yes, I
think, it's better to drop the comment. Should I re-spin the patch with comment removal in it? 

-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.
Sent from my pdp-11

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-30 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-19 12:21 [PATCH] i2c: davinci: Increase module clock frequency Alexander Sverdlin
2015-11-20  0:22 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-11-30 13:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-30 14:00   ` Alexander Sverdlin [this message]
2015-11-30 14:10     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-30 14:51       ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Sverdlin
2015-11-30 14:56         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-30 15:02         ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=565C566C.7000809@nokia.com \
    --to=alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).