From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E302AC4727E for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBD52076C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727557AbgJGISM (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 04:18:12 -0400 Received: from mailout08.rmx.de ([94.199.90.85]:49432 "EHLO mailout08.rmx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725976AbgJGISL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 04:18:11 -0400 Received: from kdin02.retarus.com (kdin02.dmz1.retloc [172.19.17.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout08.rmx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5nJt4PySzMnHB; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:18:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mta.arri.de (unknown [217.111.95.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kdin02.retarus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5nJT6bdXz2TTHp; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:17:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from n95hx1g2.localnet (192.168.54.126) by mta.arri.de (192.168.100.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:17:13 +0200 From: Christian Eggers To: Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Oleksij Rempel , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine=2DK=F6nig?= , "David Laight" , Pengutronix Kernel Team , NXP Linux Team , , , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: imx: Fix reset of I2SR_IAL flag Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:17:11 +0200 Message-ID: <5729679.lNAy7qQNGU@n95hx1g2> Organization: Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG In-Reply-To: References: <20201006160814.22047-1-ceggers@arri.de> <20201006160814.22047-2-ceggers@arri.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-IP: [192.168.54.126] X-RMX-ID: 20201007-101751-4C5nJT6bdXz2TTHp-0@kdin02 X-RMX-SOURCE: 217.111.95.66 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 7 October 2020, 09:50:23 CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > I replied to your v2 with testing, so what happened with all my tested tags? I am quite new to the kernel development process. Seems that I should integrate all "Tested-by" tags into following version of my patches. In which cases shall the tested tags be kept and in which cases they become invalid? Best regards Christian