From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>, Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] i2c: i801: Fix I2C Block Read on 8-Series/C220 and later
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:00:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5743FC27.2000307@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160523114740.1f8cf29e@endymion>
Hi
On 05/23/2016 12:47 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Starting with the 8-Series/C220 PCH (Lynx Point), the SMBus
> controller includes a SPD EEPROM protection mechanism. Once the SPD
> Write Disable bit is set, only reads are allowed to slave addresses
> 0x50-0x57.
>
> However the legacy implementation of I2C Block Read since the ICH5
> looks like a write, and is therefore blocked by the SPD protection
> mechanism. This causes the eeprom and at24 drivers to fail.
>
> So assume that I2C Block Read is implemented as an actual read on
> these chipsets. I tested it on my Q87 chipset and it seems to work
> just fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> ---
> Jarkko, Mika, that's what I'm using on my machine now. It works, but
> obviously I'd prefer to have confirmation from Intel hardware people
> that this is the right thing to do before it goes upstream.
>
I haven't yet found the contact but search is on going.
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-24 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-23 9:47 [RFC PATCH] i2c: i801: Fix I2C Block Read on 8-Series/C220 and later Jean Delvare
2016-05-24 7:00 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2016-06-19 17:09 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5743FC27.2000307@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).