From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 1/2] i2c: versatile: Allow compile test build
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:33:20 +0100
Message-ID: <57878690.7020702@arm.com>
References: <1468042283.21863.2.camel@ingics.com>
 <20160711084457.GI8609@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <57876EA2.5000106@arm.com> <20160714120804.GA4149@tetsubishi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:42508 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750912AbcGNMdZ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 08:33:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160714120804.GA4149@tetsubishi>
Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org



On 14/07/16 13:08, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Thanks Liviu for testing them. Since these are cleanup patches, they
>> need to wait for v4.9, PR for v4.8 already sent and pulled.
>
> I'd think they should go via my I2C tree anyhow.
>

Sorry, I was wrong, I misread the path. Thanks for pulling.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep