linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] i2c: rcar: tackle race conditions in the driver
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:01:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5862854.ojJ1sDI4ap@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447948611-2615-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>

Hi Wolfram,

Thank you for the patches.

For the whole series,

Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

On Thursday 19 November 2015 16:56:40 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hello RCar Fans!
> 
> So, here is V3 of this series. After a debugging session with Laurent, we
> finally fixed his issue for good. It was not board dependent as we thought,
> but toolchain dependent! Hidden by a macro, the driver used a compound
> assignemt with a function call as the rvalue. After patch 6, this function
> also changed the flags which were to be changed by the compound assignment.
> Basically (after macro):
> 
> 	priv->flags |= i_change_priv_flags(priv);
> 
> Which is undefined behaviour, I guess. However, after my refactoring, the
> called functions always returned 0, so we can simply do:
> 
> 	i_change_priv_flags(priv);
> 
> Nasty one, but finally issue gone, for all toolchains and optimization
> settings. Furthermore, patch 11 has been added because HW engineers wanted
> it.
> 
> The branch can be found here:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git
> renesas/rcar-i2c-rework-v3
> 
> Please test, test, test :)
> 
>    Wolfram
> 
> 
> Changes since V2:
> * patch 6/11 was cleaned up to not use the compund assignment
> * patch 11/11 introduced as requested by HW engineers
> 
> Changes since V1:
> * new patch 1/10 to ensure clock is always on
> * rebased patch 2/10 to the new patch
> * some patch descriptions slightly reworded
> 
> 
> Here is the description of the V1 series for those who missed it:
> 
> Two issues people have seen with the i2c-rcar driver was:
> 
> a) immediately restarted messages after NACK from client
> b) duplicated data bytes in messages
> 
> Some people already worked on those and had a tough time because it was hard
> to reproduce these issues on non-customer setup. Luckily, I somewhen had a
> state where the first transfer after boot would always show the above
> issues on a plain Renesas Lager board. When measuring, I found a third
> issue thanks to my new tool 'i2ctransfer' (and thanks to projects like
> sigrok and OpenLogicSniffer, of course. Thank you very much!):
> 
> c) after read message, no repeated start was sent, but stop + start.
> 
> Due to some unlucky design choices in the IP core, it has some race windows
> which can cause problems if interrupts get delayed. Also, for every new
> message in one transfer, context switches between interrupt and process
> were needed.
> 
> So I refactored the driver to setup new messages in interrupt context, too.
> This avoids the race for b) because we are now setting up the new message
> before we release the i2c bus clock (before we released the clock and set up
> the message in process context). c) is also fixed, this was not a race but
> a bug in the state handling. a) however is not fixed 100% :( We have the
> race window as small as possible now when utilizing interrupts, so it is an
> improvement and worked for my test cases well. There were experiments by me
> and Renesas engineers to use polling to prevent the issue but this caused
> other side effects, sadly. So, let's improve the situation now and let's
> see where we get.
> 
> I did quite some lab testing here and also verified that slave support does
> not suffer from these changes. However, I'd really appreciate if people
> could give this real-world-testing which is always different.
> 
> Please have a look, a test, etc...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>    Wolfram
> 
> 
> Wolfram Sang (11):
>   i2c: rcar: make sure clocks are on when doing clock calculation
>   i2c: rcar: rework hw init
>   i2c: rcar: remove unused IOERROR state
>   i2c: rcar: remove spinlock
>   i2c: rcar: refactor setup of a msg
>   i2c: rcar: init new messages in irq
>   i2c: rcar: don't issue stop when HW does it automatically
>   i2c: rcar: check master irqs before slave irqs
>   i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
>   i2c: rcar: clean up after refactoring
>   i2c: rcar: handle difference in setting up non-first message
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 249 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-19 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-19 15:56 [PATCH v3 00/11] i2c: rcar: tackle race conditions in the driver Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] i2c: rcar: make sure clocks are on when doing clock calculation Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] i2c: rcar: rework hw init Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] i2c: rcar: remove unused IOERROR state Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] i2c: rcar: remove spinlock Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] i2c: rcar: refactor setup of a msg Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] i2c: rcar: init new messages in irq Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] i2c: rcar: don't issue stop when HW does it automatically Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] i2c: rcar: check master irqs before slave irqs Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early Wolfram Sang
2016-03-31 21:02   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-03-31 22:48     ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-01 19:55       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-01 20:14         ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-01 23:05           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-02  7:27             ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-02 12:51               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-03  8:25                 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 13:35                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-03 13:47                     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] i2c: rcar: clean up after refactoring Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] i2c: rcar: handle difference in setting up non-first message Wolfram Sang
2015-11-19 16:01 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-11-30 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] i2c: rcar: tackle race conditions in the driver Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5862854.ojJ1sDI4ap@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).