From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] i2c: xiic: fix indentation issue Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 15:48:13 -0800 Message-ID: <60cd544bfba4251cf656f377c20ccf8b470a92dc.camel@perches.com> References: <20200127102303.44133-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <2dd84ab2-a7a3-fdd8-6bd6-07f1b3d5cd00@xilinx.com> <20200127120535.GC1847@kadam> <89661e5e-7662-81a5-ec36-57367825de5e@canonical.com> <35ed6501-3b26-36a9-d332-d4ed3366ebd8@axentia.se> <3b287fb5-e344-c13a-2803-09c2958b9b0d@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3b287fb5-e344-c13a-2803-09c2958b9b0d@canonical.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Colin Ian King , Peter Rosin , Dan Carpenter , Michal Simek , Johan Hovold Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-01-28 at 23:10 +0000, Colin Ian King wrote: > On 28/01/2020 21:45, Peter Rosin wrote: > > On 2020-01-27 13:08, Colin Ian King wrote: > > > On 27/01/2020 12:05, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > > > > > On 27. 01. 20 11:23, Colin King wrote: > > > > > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a statement that is indented one level too deeply, remove > > > > > > the extraneous tab. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > > > > > > --- > > > > > > V2: fix type in commit message > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c | 2 +- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c > > > > > > index b17d30c9ab40..90c1c362394d 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c > > > > > > @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int xiic_clear_rx_fifo(struct xiic_i2c *i2c) > > > > > > xiic_getreg8(i2c, XIIC_DRR_REG_OFFSET); > > > > > > if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) { > > > > > > dev_err(i2c->dev, "Failed to clear rx fifo\n"); > > > > > > - return -ETIMEDOUT; > > > > > > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > > > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As was suggested by Peter you should also add Fixes: ("patch > > > > > subject") > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's not really a bugfix, it's just a cleanup. > > > > > > I'm surprised i wasn't asked for a bug number too. > > > > Very funny. > > Apologies for being flippant. I didn't mean to offend. My bad #1. > > > I realize that you, the three complainers (Johan, Dan and Colin), together > > have almost 10000 commits. So, I feel a bit outranked. > > > > However, this ridicule is unfair. It's not unfair. In _no_ sense is a whitespace only change a valid reason to use a "Fixes:" tag. A whitespace only coding-style issue is _not_ a bug. >>From submitting-patches: If your patch fixes a bug in a specific commit, e.g. you found an issue using ``git bisect``, please use the 'Fixes:' tag with the first 12 characters of the SHA-1 ID, and the one line summary.