On Sunday, 10 August 2025 00:11:20 CEST Jonas Jelonek wrote:
> Hi Sven,
> 
> On 09.08.2025 08:40, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > @@ -314,6 +343,7 @@ static u32 rtl9300_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *a)
> >  {
> >  	return I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE |
> >  	       I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA |
> > +	       I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK | 
I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_I2C_BLOCK |
> >  	       I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA;
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Is there a specific reason you explicitly use I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK 
and
> *_WRITE_* instead of I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK ?

To be honest, I've just adopted this from the original version of the patch 
and didn't spend a second on thinking about a potential simplification.

So yes, thank you for pointing it out. I will integrate it in the patchset and 
most likely send out a new version addressing all the comments (until then)  
at ~8 pm (GMT+2). The preview can be found at 
https://git.open-mesh.org/linux-merge.git/log/?h=b4/i2c-rtl9300-multi-byte

Kind regards,
	Sven