From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/13] mfd: intel-lpss: Pass HSUART configuration via properties Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:53:04 +0100 Message-ID: <6720400.mTdslW7yXO@wuerfel> References: <1448360579-79260-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1448360579-79260-12-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1448360579-79260-12-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jarkko Nikula , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Mika Westerberg , Kevin Fenzi , Wolfram Sang List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 November 2015 12:22:57 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > +static struct property_entry uart_properties[] = { > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("reg-io-width", 4), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("reg-shift", 2), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8("snps,uart-16550-compatible", 1), > + { }, > If I read the binding correctly, the "snps,uart-16550-compatible" property is meant to be boolean, meaning true if present and zero-length or false if absent. Using a u8 propert instead feels wrong. Maybe we can have a PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL() for that? Arnd