Designware patches

Designware patches

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 619 bytes --]

Hi Jarkko and everyone,

there are a bunch of patches pending for the designware driver and I am
a bit lost e.g. if a series is superseding another series by taking a
different approach, if there are contradicting series, or what would be
a good order to pick them. May I ask for some assistance here? The list
of patches can be seen here:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?submitter=&state=&q=design&archive=&delegate=

I'd suggest I apply patches whenever they get acked- or rev-by tags. Or
drop them when someone says so in a reply to the patch. Does that sound
like a plan?

Thanks,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Designware patches

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 19:08 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Jarkko and everyone,
> 
> there are a bunch of patches pending for the designware driver and I
> am
> a bit lost e.g. if a series is superseding another series by taking a
> different approach, if there are contradicting series, or what would
> be
> a good order to pick them. May I ask for some assistance here? The
> list
> of patches can be seen here:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-
> i2c/list/?submitter=&state=&q=design&archive=&delegate=

Wow, there is a couple from ancient times!

> 
> I'd suggest I apply patches whenever they get acked- or rev-by tags.
> Or
> drop them when someone says so in a reply to the patch. Does that
> sound
> like a plan?

My patches can't be applied since it touches PCI part.


-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Re: Designware patches

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 654 bytes --]


> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-
> > i2c/list/?submitter=&state=&q=design&archive=&delegate=
> 
> Wow, there is a couple from ancient times!

We can skip the one from 2013 :) And I missed the ack for the 2015 one,
will apply it now.

> 
> > 
> > I'd suggest I apply patches whenever they get acked- or rev-by tags.
> > Or
> > drop them when someone says so in a reply to the patch. Does that
> > sound
> > like a plan?
> 
> My patches can't be applied since it touches PCI part.

I assume s/can't/can/ here and that

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/610444/

is obsolete meanwhile then?

Thanks,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Designware patches

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 19:30 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-
> > > i2c/list/?submitter=&state=&q=design&archive=&delegate=
> > 
> > Wow, there is a couple from ancient times!
> 
> We can skip the one from 2013 :) And I missed the ack for the 2015
> one,
> will apply it now.

I assume that Jarkko's patches we should review or comment, but I don't
remember if it was the case that time.

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > I'd suggest I apply patches whenever they get acked- or rev-by
> > > tags.
> > > Or
> > > drop them when someone says so in a reply to the patch. Does that
> > > sound
> > > like a plan?
> > 
> > My patches can't be applied since it touches PCI part.
> 
> I assume s/can't/can/ here and that

True

> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/610444/
> 
> is obsolete meanwhile then?

Looks so wrt Jarkko's comment.

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Re: Designware patches

[Jarkko Nikula]

On 06/19/2016 08:08 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Jarkko and everyone,
>
> there are a bunch of patches pending for the designware driver and I am
> a bit lost e.g. if a series is superseding another series by taking a
> different approach, if there are contradicting series, or what would be
> a good order to pick them. May I ask for some assistance here? The list
> of patches can be seen here:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?submitter=&state=&q=design&archive=&delegate=
>
> I'd suggest I apply patches whenever they get acked- or rev-by tags. Or
> drop them when someone says so in a reply to the patch. Does that sound
> like a plan?
>
Yeah, there has been some activity recently. So far I don't remember we 
have any urgent fixes pending. Acked and reviewed patches are easy this 
time: they are independent and there are no contradicting patches so 
should be safe to apply.

Lucas De Marchi's patch seems to be still problematic for  	Christian.

Jisheng Zhang's and Ulf Hansson's sets are both around CLK and PM. 
Hinting there are things needs to be changed. I quess Jisheng's patches 
had some opens and left floating. Ulf's recent set is under discussion.

-- 
Jarkko