Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Parse Error correctly in i2c GSI mode

[Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com>]

Thanks Vinod and Andi !

It had time and also there was a comment to get sign off from DMA 
maintainers, we have had review and discussion on DMA part too.

Hi Vinod, Since this is already merged, do you have preference to revert 
OR making a new change if any BUG OR design issue ? I can also fix the 
changes you suggest and raise a new patch in case of any real bug OR 
design expectations.


On 4/2/2024 10:14 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:15:24PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> On 28-03-24, 08:36, Andi Shyti wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:56:39 +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>>> I2C driver currently reports "DMA txn failed" error even though it's
>>>> NACK OR BUS_PROTO OR ARB_LOST. Detect NACK error when no device ACKs
>>>> on the bus instead of generic transfer failure which doesn't give any
>>>> specific clue.
>>>>
>>>> Make Changes inside i2c driver callback handler function
>>>> i2c_gpi_cb_result() to parse these errors and make sure GSI driver
>>>> stores the error status during error interrupt.
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Applied to i2c/i2c-host-next on
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/local tree
>>
>> You applied changes to dmaengine driver without my ack! I dont agree to
>> the approach here, we could do better
> 
> this must be an error from b4 ty. The changes have been added to
> 
> pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git
> 
> branch i2c/i2c-host, As it has been agreed from very long.
> 
> Anyway, the changes are in -next. What do we do now? Do I revert
> it? Mukesh, can you please agree with Vinod?
> 
> Andi