From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [BUG] i2c-hid: ELAN Touchpad does not work on ASUS X580GD Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:20:58 +0300 Message-ID: <7728da79-8a7a-b87d-d09c-b36978b3032e@linux.intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Chiu Cc: Daniel Drake , Jian-Hong Pan , Jiri Kosina , Benjamin Tissoires , Jani Nikula , Hans de Goede , Dmitry Torokhov , Adrian Salido , Jason Gerecke , linux-input , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Linux Upstreaming Team List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 05/15/2018 06:22 AM, Chris Chiu wrote: > What if I change the 120MHz to 180MHz and then make sure that the I2C operates > in target FS mode frequency 400kHz via scope? Would there be any side effect? > Maybe some other busses frequency could be also affected and causing some other > component malfunction? > Should be safe. It is only clock rate information when registering a fixed clock with known rate in intel-lpss.c and i2c-designware uses that info when calculating the timing parameters. I.e. it doesn't change any internal clocks. I'm trying to find a contact who can confirm what is the expected rate of I2C input clock and is it common to all Cannon Lake HW. -- Jarkko