From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: do not show SDA hold time warning when not needed
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:23:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b011e1e-8fa3-07c4-6688-5e258fd64dbd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418095939.68788787@free-electrons.com>
On 04/18/2017 10:59 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:54:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 22:53 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>>> When the I2C controller IP block has a revision too old to be able to
>>> configure the SDA hold time, the driver currently displays a
>>> warning. However, it does so unconditionally, even if no SDA hold time
>>> has been configured through the Device Tree. This causes useless
>>> warnings when running the system, so only show the warning if a SDA
>>> hold time was specified.
>>
>> As far as I understand the warning it would be better to keep it in
>> either way, though you may shift it to debug level.
>>
>> Wolfram, Jarkko, thoughts?
>
> Why show a message when the user has not requested a custom SDA hold
> time? Getting a warning about something you haven't requested seems
> really odd.
>
> I think it makes a lot more sense to keep it at the warning level
> (because it's important to get this message if you configure a custom
> SDA hold time), but only show it when appropriate.
>
I guess warning over debug level could have slightly better chance to
prevent someone not adding needless "i2c-sda-hold-time-ns" property in a
hardware that doesn't support SDA hold time. But needless spamming have
negative value so this is worth to fix. (I would do this as a single
liner by else if ()).
Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-14 20:53 [PATCH] i2c: designware: do not show SDA hold time warning when not needed Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-18 7:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-04-18 7:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-18 10:23 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2017-06-02 20:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-06-03 13:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-06-03 21:25 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b011e1e-8fa3-07c4-6688-5e258fd64dbd@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).