From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] omap: i2c: don't check bus state IP rev3.3 and earlier Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:33:41 -0800 Message-ID: <7hvbm1d4ui.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <20141124210809.GG2817@atomide.com> <1416867655-22232-1-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <20141125141924.GD1843@katana> <7E0A0B24-91D5-41A4-B007-004C5965D0D7@gmail.com> <7hvbm3jdq1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <65BAE81D-E894-48EB-B5A0-0D0FFB9B448F@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <65BAE81D-E894-48EB-B5A0-0D0FFB9B448F-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> (Alexander Kochetkov's message of "Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:26:10 +0300") Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alexander Kochetkov Cc: Wolfram Sang , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Felipe Balbi List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Alexander Kochetkov writes: > 25 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F=D0=B1. 2014 =D0=B3., =D0=B2 22:13, Kevin Hilman= =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0= ): > >> I'll test your patch on all my OMAP boards. Put whatever debug outp= ut >> you want, and I'll send you links to all the boot output. > > Hello, Kevin! > > I've sent the patch[1]. Could you be so kind to run it on all your OM= AP boards? > Thank you very much! > It is not urgent at all. Done. Built for omap2plus_defconfig, boot reports for all my OMAP boards here:=20 http://people.linaro.org/~khilman/tmp/next-20141126-1-g760388ee02e4/arm= -omap2plus_defconfig/ > What is the preferred way for giving patches for you (for future)? Email is fine. I have things fully automated for primary upstream tree= s (mainline, linux-next, stable, etc.) but for stuff like this, I can trigger one-off tests. However, if Tony wants to have a branch (besides the one already goes t= o linux-next) which I would add to the automation cycle, I'm willing to d= o that. > I have one more fixes for i2c-omap (I think final). > I don't want to break tests anymore. > > And I found, that n900 boot test PASS, but in fact it doesn't[2]. > [2] http://status.armcloud.us/boot/omap3-n900/job/next/kernel/next-20= 141124/defconfig/arm-omap2plus_defconfig/ Right. For these boot tests, PASS means it got to a userspace shell, which it did. The kernel got some warnings etc. during boot, but it still booted up to a shell. Kevin