From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA806A039 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720115675; cv=none; b=SXMsCYiw33kF74pB7Gk/+Bm7U2ayEhsOKWLCFh5P4VITj7DTCkeVYyBT6BHJhRJxzfbBsCFT3u1fDn4tqfkVHmHV6yTox2x8ameS+ryVfk39mCDBQGCJ7y3vNMvUXF1FHoiw11b1o4BSCa4Nb/9kjYiMzTR3AGtgLRdO0VdoQzo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720115675; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6SaPzJpUtXiCNBBN3+a19/4lywW7X41/zCENazn0ZuI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=q73XYFbGIZtLjYfWiz+7sZdnf+Au2FzdyLqMoUJa1uhvA1pHzT8tdZIzU08w2FurwAWPdw2xMD3Ry3h+Fr4k+mqIrm33VFDBAQFMWGKIev7Nbul7MfennH19J0vs2OCCSv9Q2TkQRRPxX8bsdZK7vYzB9gvXUj7zeAwe4w9X7Ks= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=RzOW4nsg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="RzOW4nsg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1720115671; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p0OVI1ptK3bSWX9XuQZbjaE6FaTzDZuFRxPxWsvuR8o=; b=RzOW4nsgLhcK2YXT1bJjDas8Qk3d2VetM2TKGCi03dWqg300fu+sCBXw12Uoj6wcqxX6oC N3DX1u3WCjmz1hQrhJ4evfdXXdv/KAhKLjfUQH4zi9vrMdzcKep1oXtPoco4v9Yw0cwhR7 ycy39/y3sYv4st8P9K9IBgQBac2draU= Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-671-SG5MrFhsMCqUlrqeWHmABg-1; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:54:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SG5MrFhsMCqUlrqeWHmABg-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a77bd20b09aso60380366b.2 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720115669; x=1720720469; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p0OVI1ptK3bSWX9XuQZbjaE6FaTzDZuFRxPxWsvuR8o=; b=p+aeoMrPrujCDZXwJ3gikDPq2W624UIY/bpRhfOvuB8KrE6/d6Ie3ECyL/xp8SxNQH FSH+b9JfoQlFsp5aWa14lVShpcSQigwAb7WE2kxg7Vm6vd8ihs3j4UTex/+MBvL3f2Fe ItDTJW8Z2tT0TuM8BFeYtfJPzhkv7T8AwO606+YhSM6PlVI7odoFm+r2MWCC6hi2Ehow IQ/blibJonEXbpmDBFKc3iXWZCJSkVKyUDpjYM1TAVhx5p/Vrdi3dA9T1n0LCm+CZu1g 6Sn2GOhefJ39VJKK9OOFhapekqFI3mv1tl6u3KjjVt8uYeiGFVMFB+A6BWD205NIWQ4A 6Zww== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVj6Jyt11VMiUb0v/hyqqwWpv7/mv7j0VV3SB6dRb1+cgH+LcQq+vlmdeyrxZxgimYCjE6yFq3fQrbFkB4g2dGwqzdTxMJ9O/3K X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxaXg/1a72/9JVP2boCr4g6iL7Lg3KKfeEEDFNQS2rH6dTXAWLV N//tkekyy5jp3pFpnzyfCWlbc5Pt39IZ5GwCXY5sJ4jUC6JmgMTUC+uazmqF+AnR4gQLVVRCdIA Ib+j1qKsCUsQnlbD+pL2o7HvRtyS+H73gyaYOBJRSmjG45jCH4sigtouCJA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4794:b0:a75:3c1d:f9c9 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a77ba4690e7mr166357866b.28.1720115668744; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:54:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEIaHVEMgR3On7nbwmlnWYURIUoemqKks+AS875LqsZN1Y+C07apyttEGqFq2Ys3ge4Ospd5w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4794:b0:a75:3c1d:f9c9 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a77ba4690e7mr166356266b.28.1720115668287; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec? (2001-1c00-0c32-7800-5bfa-a036-83f0-f9ec.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a72ab08d138sm615353166b.158.2024.07.04.10.54.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8328c997-590f-4785-b1dc-8714633ef31c@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 19:54:26 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] i2c-i801 / dell-lis3lv02d: Move instantiation of lis3lv02d i2c_client from i2c-i801 to dell-lis3lv02d To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ilpo_J=C3=A4rvinen?= , Andy Shevchenko , Paul Menzel , Wolfram Sang , eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net, Marius Hoch , Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com, Kai Heng Feng , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , Andi Shyti , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org References: <20240624111519.15652-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20240624182812.fa6akymygv3qolug@pali> <20240703184121.t2wh5sb5ki2kwots@pali> <991b1de6-10fc-4917-8e1c-442a71adf04e@redhat.com> <20240704155433.pe3j3bclr3ukn2w5@pali> Content-Language: en-US, nl From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: <20240704155433.pe3j3bclr3ukn2w5@pali> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, On 7/4/24 5:54 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 04 July 2024 12:17:27 Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi Pali, >> >> On 7/3/24 8:41 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: >>> On Wednesday 03 July 2024 12:58:01 Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 6/24/24 8:28 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: >>>>> On Monday 24 June 2024 13:15:12 Hans de Goede wrote: >>>>>> Hans de Goede (6): >>>>>> i2c: core: Setup i2c_adapter runtime-pm before calling device_add() >>>>>> i2c: i801: Use a different adapter-name for IDF adapters >>>>>> platform/x86: dell-smo8800: Move SMO88xx acpi_device_ids to >>>>>> dell-smo8800-ids.h >>>>>> platform/x86: dell-smo8800: Move instantiation of lis3lv02d i2c_client >>>>>> from i2c-i801 to dell-lis3lv02d >>>>>> platform/x86: dell-smo8800: Add a couple more models to >>>>>> lis3lv02d_devices[] >>>>>> platform/x86: dell-smo8800: Add support for probing for the >>>>>> accelerometer i2c address >>>>> >>>>> Patches 1-5 looks good. There are just a few minor things, but you can add >>>>> Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>>> For patch 6 as I mentioned previously I'm strictly against this change >>>>> until somebody goes and politely ask Dell about the current situation of >>>>> the discovering of accelerometer's i2c address. >>>> >>>> Dell is on the Cc and not responding... >>> >>> And what do you expecting here? That somebody on the group address >>> specified in CC list would react to all your tons of messages? Not >>> mentioning the fact that you did not even ask anything. >> >> You keep on repeating this since I first posted this patch >> in December last year, but as I already wrote back then: > > Yes, because you have not done anything and you are just repeating those > nonsenses. What are you expecting? You are either doing all this on > purpose or you are just lazy and think that somebody (e.g. me) would do > this stuff. > >> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/8b3946e0-7eb5-4e1f-9708-1f6cfda95e1a@redhat.com/ >> >> "Unfortunately I no longer have any contacts inside Dell" >> >> And Paul Menzel reached out back to gkh back then asking >> if Greg had any contacts in he did not have any contacts >> either. >> >> Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com is the official address listed >> for Dell drivers under drivers/platform/x86 . > > Perfect. And may you explain why you have not tried to contact them with > addressed requests of exact information of what you need and ask for > help? You wrote tons of emails with zero value. > >>> This is not how things works. >> >> The email address which I'm using is *THE* one which Dell has >> provided for contacting about Dell pdx86 drivers. I really >> don't know what else you expect me to do here. >> >> You just keep repeating that Dell should be contacted about >> this and multiple people (me and Andy) have already pointed >> out that Dell does not have any other contact info. Repeating >> the same remark over and over does not change things. >> >> As I mentioned in my other email too, if you think you can do >> better feel free to try and contact Dell your self, something > > I'm not your servant and I'm not going to play role of your secretary. > >> which you could already have done the first time you mentioned >> this in December 2023, back when I already said I don't have >> any other contact info for Dell. > > Could you stop complaining? I'm really not interested in your stories > why you are not wanted to do anything. > >>> If you do not change your attitude here then I highly doubt that >>> somebody will respond to you. >>> >>> I have feeling that you are doing it on purpose just because you do not >>> want to do anything, and trying to find some kind of proof that nobody >>> is responding to you, to convince others for merge your last hack change. >> >> This is just plain hurtful I do not believe I have ever done >> anything to earn this level of distrust from you. > > Then read your message again. Now it is more clear that you are doing > it on purpose. > >> I am hurt that you cannot at least show the common decency to >> assume good intentions from my side. > > I hope that I do not have to explain you how to find contact address in > MAINTAINERS file, how to write an addressed email for target audience, > how to formulate questions and how to ask for information. And how to do > it in _one_ message. Really? Doubling down after insulting me (calling my integrity into question) ? So be it, I will simply not be responding to you in this thread anymore. Regards, Hans