From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC197C433E1 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EC120658 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gpePEsJ5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726546AbgHMQ3H (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:29:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726142AbgHMQ3G (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:29:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x641.google.com (mail-ej1-x641.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::641]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20445C061757 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x641.google.com with SMTP id d6so6845771ejr.5 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=S3r0lDCw4aZ8lbwfCN/5/1eV8jZf9bM4JYaVEVxu/w0=; b=gpePEsJ5+XjdzFqPh6isAUBFeUfvAgW3MivdiygC4/nouZq/fFLHuaic07padJo8m4 dsMD8CIi3ZgECKmJfPwAc312c7kE/YljC0HfUPgzmOSXFA4KYialotOqLVp2+PKlQJvU 2SpQfAek+wFNMs6bC/VBecU0GXshpM74XEm2wBzzscwViyfVsKOwUeG2lOcipRSNt6Be Tpc8BXB+dKb8217tkYYst/JwPSLBTW9i3yfOhk3vSh2e7O2bPf8Lz0NLcqwQ61cKUk69 yjXqfNyD1W0VyBMJIptr9PuJ43nhs3nVHgkwdt0ShOWs4FR3tl1lCmpDiykbbOlVeC+D 9A/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=S3r0lDCw4aZ8lbwfCN/5/1eV8jZf9bM4JYaVEVxu/w0=; b=Zpccb9nfd20/vk/HyRpNZYAhoYLV1n4VIpYT01u8o+w1XzgiG7NpdqL+yOVZOZiI5e 2ask+DD58muRaL6XxqomRzd2uTwD/SgsKDuFQVcLEyMeQSndfoFy1vISs2rMmCigGoY0 8D41THQNI3JD16knuhgb90hz/IeejvTCZ1ocWC+UEhhSr1WPBgD9nB/9xVZX0SXwTBw7 8Af8Y5pYl4JRVHYwW0lBFtFoWhupViQWmiDtClOQWPBa1KQXoo3iqxUWt1k5c4JfMDHg d0i//oXnUGMbW4p2ZxKU+RzCCbW0VH7py2XNeU5RqO/nEZbsPQ/NBjJFsdGcA4NI2Ate SBpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FGjfrva+FZ7nSrI/tp+hIh7jw33suOg2bU2gRMK38C934RBod azzwANeguZQh/1MkmRWNO44= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXOtZvllmy+AQYhoRf/IWMRcbPYK7A6k/tDAn75SZNDs69E1jvD6Fo2hmEByblLb4e1Tu2Gw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d181:: with SMTP id c1mr5410506ejz.181.1597336144785; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell.be.48ers.dk ([195.162.189.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm4284735edn.12.2020.08.13.09.29.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peko by dell.be.48ers.dk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6G6A-0003ae-SX; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:29:02 +0200 From: Peter Korsgaard To: Mohammed Billoo Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: add gaisler to platform data References: <20200811134426.7613-1-mab@mab-labs.com> <87lfii7i18.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:29:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Mohammed Billoo's message of "Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:49:59 -0400") Message-ID: <87h7t67bn5.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Mohammed" == Mohammed Billoo writes: Hi, > And the answer is a patch series (I couldn't figure out the appropriate > term to google). Indeed. Please send a patch series for the needed changes to linux-i2c and put me in CC. > Also, it looks like the linux-i2c mailing list no longer exists? It does. Perhaps you need to subscribe to be able to post? My earlier reply did make it to the list: https://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=159732786421840&w=2 > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:33 AM Mohammed Billoo wrote: >> Peter, >> >> Thanks for your comment. Would you like me to resubmit the patch with your >> suggestions? >> >> Also, we'll need to incorporate big/little-endian with the GRLIB accessors >> as well (I ran into an issue where a vendor-specific AHB bridge had >> endianness conversion, but the IP designer didn't realize that and so I >> needed an accessor for both GRLIB and big-endian). I'm not sure what the >> best-practice for multiple patches is. Should I submit patch N assuming >> patch N-1 was applied? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard