Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: add gaisler to platform data

Peter Korsgaard
2020-08-13T16:29:09Z

>>>>> "Mohammed" == Mohammed Billoo <mab@mab-labs.com> writes:

Hi,

> And the answer is a patch series (I couldn't figure out the appropriate
> term to google).

Indeed. Please send a patch series for the needed changes to linux-i2c
and put me in CC.

> Also, it looks like the linux-i2c mailing list no longer exists?

It does. Perhaps you need to subscribe to be able to post? My earlier
reply did make it to the list:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=159732786421840&w=2

> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:33 AM Mohammed Billoo <mab@mab-labs.com> wrote:

>> Peter,
>>
>> Thanks for your comment. Would you like me to resubmit the patch with your
>> suggestions?
>>
>> Also, we'll need to incorporate big/little-endian with the GRLIB accessors
>> as well (I ran into an issue where a vendor-specific AHB bridge had
>> endianness conversion, but the IP designer didn't realize that and so I
>> needed an accessor for both GRLIB and big-endian). I'm not sure what the
>> best-practice for multiple patches is. Should I submit patch N assuming
>> patch N-1 was applied?

--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard