From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
wsa@kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: Return EPROBE_DEFER if gc->to_irq is NULL
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 20:26:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8xmxkg7.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MdByxO3+hJruvUkULtXAaB7aWewTd=Wv0MbWyX2vykdjA@mail.gmail.com> (Bartosz Golaszewski's message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:00:07 +0100")
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> writes:
> My email address changed in September, that's why I didn't see the
> email you sent in November to my old one.
Hi Bart,
thanks for the prompt reply and sorry for the wrong email address.
> gpiod_to_irq() can be used in context other than driver probing, I'm
> worried existing users would not know how to handle it. Also: how come
> you can get the GPIO descriptor from the provider but its interrupts
> are not yet set up?
I'm definitely some context here, as its been quite a while.
Shreeya, feel free to pitch in. :)
This is one of the races we saw in gpiochip_add_irqchip, depending on
the probe order. The gc is already visible while partially initialized,
if pinctrl-amd hasn't been probed yet. Another device being probed can
hit an -ENXIO here if to_irq is yet uninitialized or enter .to_irq() and
oops. Shreeya's patch workarounds the first issue, but is not a
solution for the second.
There is another patch that has been flying around to address the Oops.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/11/8/900
She's been working on a proper solution for that one, which might
actually address this too and replace the current patch. Maybe you
could help us get to a proper solution there? I'm quite unfamiliar with
this code myself :)
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-11 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 9:38 [PATCH v4] gpio: Return EPROBE_DEFER if gc->to_irq is NULL Shreeya Patel
2022-02-10 16:36 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-02-10 18:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-02-11 1:26 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2022-02-11 10:03 ` Shreeya Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8xmxkg7.fsf@collabora.com \
--to=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=shreeya.patel@collabora.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).