From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:14:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc17km2m.fsf@thor.barco.com> References: <52540DF6.6050407@nsn.com> <20131008213642.GB29121@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131008213642.GB29121@katana> (Wolfram Sang's message of "Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:36:43 +0200") Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Ionut Nicu , Alexander Sverdlin , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "WS" == Wolfram Sang writes: WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote: >> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning >> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the >> module again to get it working. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu WS> Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too? Arguably yes. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard This message is subject to the following terms and conditions: MAIL DISCLAIMER