From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] OMAP2/3: I2C: Errata ID i207: Clear wrong RDR interrupt Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:17:48 -0700 Message-ID: <87wrvrhd9v.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1272433677-28658-1-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> <4BD80867.7020801@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BD80867.7020801@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Wed\, 28 Apr 2010 05\:05\:27 -0500") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "ben-linux@fluff.org" , "Kalliguddi, Hema" , Aaro Koskinen , Tony Lindgren List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Nishanth Menon writes: > very minor comments below: > On 04/28/2010 12:47 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: [...] >> struct omap_i2c_dev { >> struct device *dev; >> @@ -199,6 +201,7 @@ struct omap_i2c_dev { >> u16 bufstate; >> u16 syscstate; >> u16 westate; >> + u16 errata; > overall I'd prefer the term quirk over errata - quirk is more of a > standard linux term used accross network, usb and other drivers, will > allow the code to be a little more familiar with the upstream > maintainers/reviewers.. but i leave it to tony and others to comment > more.. maybe it is just me being an ass again ;) I prefer the term errata since it is also the term used by TI docs. Kevin