From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Esben Haabendal <esben.haabendal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: imx: Simplify stopped state tracking
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:25:34 +0200
Message-ID: <87zhxuo9o1.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20180709094304.8814-1-esben.haabendal@gmail.com>
        <20180709094304.8814-4-esben.haabendal@gmail.com>
        <20180724075919.iyysd7dtbddvbavq@pengutronix.de>
        <87k1ozzquk.fsf@gmail.com>
        <20180809162652.r34omvkctzxte422@pengutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180809162652.r34omvkctzxte422@pengutronix.de> ("Uwe
        =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig=22's?= message of "Thu, 9 Aug 2018 18:26:52
 +0200")
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>, Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:06:43PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
>>=20
>> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:43:03AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> >> From: Esben Haabendal <eha@deif.com>
>> >>=20
>> >> Always update the stopped state when busy status have been checked.
>> >> This is identical to what was done before, with the exception of error
>> >> handling.
>> >> Without this change, some errors cause the stopped state to be left in
>> >> incorrect state in i2c_imx_stop(), i2c_imx_dma_read(), i2c_imx_read()=
 and
>> >> i2c_imx_xfer().
>> >>=20
>> >> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <eha@deif.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 12 ++++++------
>> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >>=20
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-im=
x.c
>> >> index d86f152176a4..1db8e6790afc 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>> >> @@ -421,10 +421,14 @@ static int i2c_imx_bus_busy(struct imx_i2c_stru=
ct *i2c_imx, int for_busy)
>> >>  			return -EAGAIN;
>> >>  		}
>> >>=20=20
>> >> -		if (for_busy && (temp & I2SR_IBB))
>> >> +		if (for_busy && (temp & I2SR_IBB)) {
>> >> +			i2c_imx->stopped =3D 0;
>> >>  			break;
>> >> -		if (!for_busy && !(temp & I2SR_IBB))
>> >> +		}
>> >> +		if (!for_busy && !(temp & I2SR_IBB)) {
>> >> +			i2c_imx->stopped =3D 1;
>> >>  			break;
>> >> +		}
>> >
>> > Would it make sense to assign to ->stopped independent of for_busy?
>>=20
>> What do you mean?
>>=20
>> Assigning to ->stopped on each check for I2SR_IBB in loop, independent
>> of the for_busy argument?  I don't think so.  The additional assignments
>> would be to the same value as it is set to already.
>
> Currently you have:
>
> 	if (for_busy && (temp & I2SR_IBB)) {
> 		i2c_imx->stopped =3D 0;
> 		break;
> 	}
>
> 	if (!for_busy && !(temp & I2SR_IBB)) {
> 		i2c_imx->stopped =3D 1;
> 		break;
> 	}
>
> The semantic of this is the same (apart from always updating .stopped)
> but is imho easier:
>
> 	i2c_imx->stopped =3D !(temp & I2SR_IBB);
>
> 	if (for_busy !=3D i2c_imx->stopped)
> 		break;

Yes, that should work also.
Shorter, but IMHO a bit more convoluted to read.
Let me know if I should send a new version with this change.

/Esben