From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBE4B10965 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 07:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707118213; cv=none; b=ItTsyPa1I4INpFunBHs8P0hv2MTKWo4QtzgJ0kvygs0Z+y7ykCAo1UwuI15pW4zn1IFG3F2agWt9byNZQ7MgqQgFpB20Ifz3vtnT+HGqPunkChAfnTBgvGhqqcqc2VFhBJFKqQzOiW4vTg7ll3M4Y34BcJZCcQJG3Eb1hrEjNEI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707118213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Yibri1B0g7XG7ok08ijuhlRxqFfA153Z05lg3ICE+NA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=NdlwrEhD4GRZ6T6D5TykiEu5heiwhOPTCKTWV0xBruZOEmNhOL3QLmzJoVwRqLWRcg+DzfUQaLnuFwmy8ExYOkJSxo7kuxjgFEXvjcas0D2FalUAFbimZB2SF2Yw/ii/0YW6BSqzBwZBcIJnORUm0XrphL0GoCdd/gIXMBF0huY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ZNvvStYs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ZNvvStYs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707118212; x=1738654212; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yibri1B0g7XG7ok08ijuhlRxqFfA153Z05lg3ICE+NA=; b=ZNvvStYsSZWtgeiKmkD+kD+HuE1W3yPXKcwWzgNcA0Y6VAA0SK2S/W2n sNlt/zBCdMhTKB5zJRFc9X70C7FH5TFfIkbOCN/AVJZiTx/riww9/YmwU QNkdr5pso/+TQ8ehK2GPtFPwHzideBiXGTGgeAoCyJesjYvhO6lu1Db/b 4cXErn/90kkL9xoCBZ+t/Th6TfEYIxAwmcJpGU5Fk6+o8iJ+fxoFu9xiB jpPC9Yl9Y6XC9eu6tZ4ORMk1WRF25d9L/dm4FYQX97ZMBdXxqzLihRoj/ GpoVFjuKdd+GRI9IItwJ4ftjXpuhNfgejvrAGkQQc7/pWNsuERw2vhWzt A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10974"; a="22947492" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,242,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="22947492" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2024 23:30:11 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10974"; a="909224221" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,242,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="909224221" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.237.72.159]) ([10.237.72.159]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2024 23:30:08 -0800 Message-ID: <8827aeed-f618-43f1-bc6d-fedc65e8fed9@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:30:07 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] i2c: designware: Generic polling mode code To: Jiawen Wu , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: 'Andi Shyti' , 'Andy Shevchenko' , 'Mika Westerberg' , 'Jan Dabros' , 'Sanket Goswami' , 'Basavaraj Natikar' , 'Michael J' References: <20240131141653.2689260-1-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> <062201da5719$0dccb790$296626b0$@trustnetic.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jarkko Nikula In-Reply-To: <062201da5719$0dccb790$296626b0$@trustnetic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi On 2/4/24 05:20, Jiawen Wu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 10:17 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: >> I've been testing this on our HW which all have interrupt connected and >> tried to cover also FIFO depth defines for Wangxun 10Gb NIC. Obviously I >> would like to know how this set works on your real HW. > > Hi Jarkko, > > Sorry for the late reply. > I've been testing the patch series on Wangxun 10Gb NIC, it works well. > Thanks! > Thank you very much! The first priority for this set it must not cause a regression on your HW and I'm glad my idea works :-)