From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"René Rebe" <rene@exactcode.de>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Stephen Horvath" <s.horvath@outlook.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4a 6/6] hwmon: (spd5118) Add configuration option for auto-detection
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:08:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90fc6f8c-0f5b-4ed4-8bdb-b6eb9d0298b4@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605021907.4125716-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
Am 05.06.24 um 04:19 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> With SPD5118 chip detection for the most part handled by the i2c-smbus
> core using DMI information, the spd5118 driver no longer needs to
> auto-detect spd5118 compliant chips.
>
> Auto-detection by the driver is still needed on systems with no DMI support
> or on systems with more than eight DIMMs and can not be removed entirely.
> However, it affects boot time and introduces the risk of mis-identifying
> chips. Add configuration option to be able to disable it on systems where
> chip detection is handled outside the driver.
Tested-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> Sent as v4a to avoid resending the entire series.
>
> v4a:
> Do not auto-select SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT if DMI is disabled
> Modify help text of SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT
> Default SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT to y if (!DMI || !X86)
>
> v4: New patch
>
> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> index 7a84e7637b51..d5eced417fc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> @@ -2193,6 +2193,25 @@ config SENSORS_SPD5118
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called spd5118.
>
> +config SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT
> + bool "Enable detect function"
> + depends on SENSORS_SPD5118
> + default (!DMI || !X86)
> + help
> + If enabled, the driver auto-detects if a chip in the SPD address
> + range is compliant to the SPD51888 standard and auto-instantiates
> + if that is the case. If disabled, SPD5118 compliant devices have
> + to be instantiated by other means. On X86 systems with DMI support
> + this will typically be done from DMI DDR detection code in the
> + I2C SMBus subsystem. Devicetree based systems will instantiate
> + attached devices if the DIMMs are listed in the devicetree file.
> +
> + Disabling the detect function will speed up boot time and reduce
> + the risk of mis-detecting SPD5118 compliant devices. However, it
> + may result in missed DIMMs under some circumstances.
> +
> + If unsure, say Y.
> +
> config SENSORS_TC74
> tristate "Microchip TC74"
> depends on I2C
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c b/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> index 5cb5e52c0a38..19d203283a21 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static bool spd5118_vendor_valid(u8 bank, u8 id)
> }
>
> /* Return 0 if detection is successful, -ENODEV otherwise */
> -static int spd5118_detect(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info)
> +static int __maybe_unused spd5118_detect(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info)
> {
> struct i2c_adapter *adapter = client->adapter;
> int regval;
> @@ -647,7 +647,9 @@ static struct i2c_driver spd5118_driver = {
> },
> .probe = spd5118_probe,
> .id_table = spd5118_id,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT
> .detect = spd5118_detect,
> +#endif
> .address_list = normal_i2c,
> };
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-07 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 4:02 [PATCH v4 0/6] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant chips Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: Add jedec,spd5118 Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant temperature sensors Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 8:48 ` Stephen Horvath
2024-06-04 14:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-07 15:55 ` Armin Wolf
2024-06-04 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] hwmon: (spd5118) Add suspend/resume support Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 8:45 ` Stephen Horvath
2024-06-04 14:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-07 15:57 ` Armin Wolf
2024-06-04 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] hwmon: (spd5118) Add support for reading SPD data Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 11:58 ` Armin Wolf
2024-06-04 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-07 15:59 ` Armin Wolf
2024-06-04 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] i2c: smbus: Support DDR5 SPD EEPROMs Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 7:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-05 12:21 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-05 13:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-17 14:42 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-17 15:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 10:25 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-18 13:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 13:51 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-18 14:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 14:59 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-18 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 15:25 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-18 15:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 18:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 18:59 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-18 19:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 15:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-18 15:27 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-07 16:06 ` Armin Wolf
2024-06-07 18:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-10 13:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-10 14:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-10 15:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-12 16:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-24 20:06 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-06-24 20:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: (spd5118) Add configuration option for auto-detection Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 4:37 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-06-04 14:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-04 7:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-04 14:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-05 2:19 ` [PATCH v4a " Guenter Roeck
2024-06-05 9:22 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-06-05 14:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-07 16:08 ` Armin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90fc6f8c-0f5b-4ed4-8bdb-b6eb9d0298b4@gmx.de \
--to=w_armin@gmx.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=rene@exactcode.de \
--cc=s.horvath@outlook.com.au \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).