From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: designware: Disable pm for PMIC i2c-bus even if there is no _SEM method
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:34:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93818dd8-01a9-bc37-fc1f-933bd7a69ed4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a30fc95-262b-78ff-7809-05ece192dd34@redhat.com>
On 3/10/2017 3:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-03-17 03:33, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> On 2017年03月09日 23:00, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>>> + Tianyu
>>>
>>> On 03/08/17 10:47, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Cherrytrail devices use the dw i2c-bus with uid 7 to access their PMIC.
>>>> Even if the i2c-bus to the PMIC is not shared with the SoC's P-Unit
>>>> and i2c-designware-baytrail.c thus does not set the pm_disabled flag,
>>>> we still need to disable pm so that ACPI PMIC opregions can access the
>>>> PMIC during late-suspend and early-resume.
>>>>
>>>> This fixes errors like these blocking suspend:
>>>>
>>>> i2c_designware 808622C1:06: timeout waiting for bus ready
>>>> ACPI Exception: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [UserDefinedRegion]
>>>> acpi 80860F14:02: Failed to change power state to D3hot
>>>> PM: late suspend of devices failed
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>>> index 8ed96dd..08d609e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>>> @@ -94,7 +94,10 @@ static void dw_i2c_acpi_params(struct
>>>> platform_device *pdev, char method[],
>>>> static int dw_i2c_acpi_configure(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> + acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
>>>> const struct acpi_device_id *id;
>>>> + struct acpi_device *adev;
>>>> + const char *uid;
>>>>
>>>> dev->adapter.nr = -1;
>>>> dev->tx_fifo_depth = 32;
>>>> @@ -114,6 +117,18 @@ static int dw_i2c_acpi_configure(struct
>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>> if (id && id->driver_data)
>>>> dev->flags |= (u32)id->driver_data;
>>>>
>>>> + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Cherrytrail I2C7 gets used for the PMIC which gets accessed
>>>> + * through ACPI opregions during late suspend / early resume
>>>> + * disable pm for it.
>>>> + */
>>>> + uid = adev->pnp.unique_id;
>>>> + if ((dev->flags & MODEL_CHERRYTRAIL) && !strcmp(uid, "7"))
>>>> + dev->pm_disabled = true;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> I'm fine with this but wondering can this be detected any other way than
>>> hardcoded bus number.
>>>
>>> Tianyu: You are the author of 5d98e61d337c ("I2C/ACPI: Add i2c ACPI
>>> operation region support"). Do you know is there way to see is there a
>>> PMIC connected to the bus?
>>>
>>> Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Hi Jarkko:
>> PMIC device node in ACPI table should have _DEP() method to return
>> devices PMIC depends on.
>
> Hmm, interesting point, but I'm afraid by the time the PMIC driver loads
> (and can make say an i2c_adapter_set_syscore call) it is already too late,
> as we need to request the irq in the i2c-adapter driver with certain
> flags and the i2c-adapter needs to be initialized before we can
> load the pmic driver.
Yes, dep_unmet field in the struct acpi_device is designed for this
case. dep_unmet will be zero after all dependent operation region
handlers are registered. Please have a look acpi_battery_add() and it
checks dep_unmet. If dep_unmet isn't equal to zero, it returns
-EPROBE_DEFER. Device core will try reprobing the device after a device
driver module is loaded. PMIC driver also should check dep_unmet in probe().
Device (PMIC)
{
Name (_ADR, Zero) // _ADR: Address
Name (_HID, "INT33FD") // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_CID, "INT33FD") // _CID: Compatible ID
Name (_DDN, "PMIC GPIO Controller") // _DDN: DOS
Device Name
Name (_HRV, 0x02) // _HRV: Hardware Revision
Name (_UID, One) // _UID: Unique ID
Name (_DEP, Package (0x01) // _DEP: Dependencies
{
I2C7
})
...
>
> I really think just doing this for bus number 7 is the best solution
> on all cherrytrail devices I've seen the PMIC is always at bus number 7.
This seems a hack way since PMIC also may have different I2C address.
This highly depends on vendor design.
>
>> I think the general way to resolve the issue
>> during suspend/resume is to make sure that I2C7 is suspended/resumed
>> later/earlier than PMIC device.
>
> That would also require making sure that the PMIC suspends after any
> devices whose _PS0 / _PS3 methods may need access to PMIC optegions,
> we do not have infrastructure in Linux to do this.
Actually, suspend/resume sequence affects by the device probing
sequence. Please have a look at deferred_probe_work_func() and
device_pm_move_last() which changes the device position in the dpm_list
during reprobing device.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-10 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 8:47 [PATCH v2 0/2] i2c: designware: Never suspend i2c-busses used for system PMICs Hans de Goede
2017-03-08 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: designware: Never suspend i2c-busses used for accessing the system PMIC Hans de Goede
2017-03-09 14:24 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-03-09 14:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-03-09 15:02 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-03-08 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: designware: Disable pm for PMIC i2c-bus even if there is no _SEM method Hans de Goede
2017-03-09 15:00 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-03-09 15:02 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-03-10 2:33 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-10 7:49 ` Hans de Goede
2017-03-10 11:34 ` Lan, Tianyu [this message]
2017-03-10 20:46 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93818dd8-01a9-bc37-fc1f-933bd7a69ed4@intel.com \
--to=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).