From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com (mail-ej1-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DE63132124 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724139157; cv=none; b=abwLHkqiA0jv0GVUTJEO5vcueaBg11tJ2SKf4w3UD+Jf7w6bbzgc2Kwyeam0pQiKq3jz4fq1ngKWez1DkSCSur1LGoug9IR6VjS70WQWlrjSLcZB10N/12MHTvyWg0zj7utDmMqM17Jo4uvZgtF61cBC8duYzLY3+d4qxVS7M2Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724139157; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T37XdcPAhagA4eDYDownsf2XsJs98bfRZyVq01bf9Dc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=E4E0kkxBManYBzvl9JOxe1HXPsutYWVCkw7vaFex7OpxXoRLDo+h3j2xEpsLESAdYffN+VEx6W0EQoLS8jfWTGudqabTStF7IrkdtFW2Va06SMfsirL2BpMtQABEZ2Q+L0JFP5m7bZvB1caodYxohcdtTFvZv77Aodp7vu0q4Rg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tuxon.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tuxon.dev; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tuxon.dev header.i=@tuxon.dev header.b=mxqQwMDK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tuxon.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tuxon.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tuxon.dev header.i=@tuxon.dev header.b="mxqQwMDK" Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7a8a4f21aeso627069266b.2 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:32:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxon.dev; s=google; t=1724139153; x=1724743953; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KgM+QzWQcZ2DUZR7KveS9LeXc/9kicV430vfS4VSRd8=; b=mxqQwMDKDGJtlLjiZ0RXn9FN4PTZxtv2pBIBAv63tyosqE3FmvqCNe2+tdzS7YjRxu UJWwYs3HX6K9cj3TzyMndluDAxfEqi6cMg1sYzsXdUz2tv8P9EyDWkyH/p1c3ZXVhwST 1TSImBRFTu7/d4K1vwVIfqMaaTMASDbzK5zxq6bZ4OvBUFlPo1eObBTwPerp/LsUbrbW TI6XjM7iBXgz8b7Iz4hXAVcpKAwFXcb/kkgpz1Q4xu9rNn+Lo3O5W2o7KG36U6hFxVpf wR1ZFxpAlvOsKernWb1pBiaUGFqfCqH6JXS6awIMF41zr6nfuuulaKOL4iEh9V54tNen vs3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724139153; x=1724743953; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KgM+QzWQcZ2DUZR7KveS9LeXc/9kicV430vfS4VSRd8=; b=vZvhK9gtq82qqBZXFs9gowUMnqcOOWuiJGvkbRXMcEBlN2vpYDbZRFUvbpQWKPWdKu +QWzntZxOjKWoS530Q/28acttrvnsrONsMSxZrloFOczJUZkeT8xg+qHgX9fdlpftkeT HVgkG8SazmJsLE1hKyNV+EKRXdWWP30G5jfsT75oZyx8RN6Nj7n+3U/a8vxZ2jsBOl1e XQFeQwSy4NfhI8VIEwob1CRyUm3Ls476DReZueb9xMTLid6wPMXc16p2QHeqtKbY5HLm ga5wZ/39OxgsLh6vNr78Tza3Ozcwz3OH9yI4yHtBjOsX2KmXJvDEYPeobSPx/K8yQOY1 SK/A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW/V+UT0ZsmGKNt4DJBnb8FZ2G4CUFsRQh4f1UE9J4ORxliLZmoTZ/OTAiV7T52aDXhk7D4RcZ10SU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy4E12pTWDV4IAjT4ZZ4YPTy25D7OGtkzmGcD5TgUDY2uGKTttU k7dgx2AcNvyS25ocOqu96Pv7ob29qcgTJj6riyAaGvKaJ9KHgTxjzYzgWgzOK5w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHkyNt7DNdr1FwUFXM1w0JBcq+qGUSMD1P8jHKB+jsefPksVAXH7weJcswaTpOC3d6flO3v/w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c7c5:b0:a7d:26ff:aeb0 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a8392952665mr895469166b.30.1724139152450; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.50.4] ([82.78.167.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a83839471c0sm726532466b.182.2024.08.20.00.32.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <96265c60-5b16-4a02-a991-ac0e06f7baf3@tuxon.dev> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:32:29 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] i2c: riic: Add support for fast mode plus Content-Language: en-US To: Andi Shyti Cc: chris.brandt@renesas.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be, magnus.damm@gmail.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Claudiu Beznea References: <20240819102348.1592171-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> <20240819102348.1592171-9-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> From: claudiu beznea In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Andi, On 19.08.2024 23:12, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Claudiu, > > ... > >> struct riic_dev { >> @@ -311,11 +315,14 @@ static int riic_init_hw(struct riic_dev *riic) >> int total_ticks, cks, brl, brh; >> struct i2c_timings *t = &riic->i2c_t; >> struct device *dev = riic->adapter.dev.parent; >> + const struct riic_of_data *info = riic->info; > > Because you are only using info->fast_mode_plus, perhaps you can > directly take: > > fast_mode_plus = riic->info->fast_mode_plus; > > and you make it even more compact. > >> >> - if (t->bus_freq_hz > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ) { >> + if ((!info->fast_mode_plus && t->bus_freq_hz > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ) || >> + (info->fast_mode_plus && t->bus_freq_hz > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ)) { >> dev_err(&riic->adapter.dev, >> - "unsupported bus speed (%dHz). %d max\n", >> - t->bus_freq_hz, I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ); >> + "unsupported bus speed (%dHz). %d max\n", t->bus_freq_hz, > > super nitpick: can you please put t->bus_freq_hz on a new line, > it looks better to either have everything put in columns or not. > >> + info->fast_mode_plus ? I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ : >> + I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ); > > another super-nitpick: can you please align > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ with I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ? It makes > more clear that there is a "? ... :" statement. I'll adjust everything as suggested. Thank you, Claudiu Beznea > > Thanks, > Andi > >> return -EINVAL; >> }