From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleksij Rempel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] i2c: imx: don't print error if DMA is not configured Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:07:56 +0100 Message-ID: <9a3fc087-2fe5-6d57-9b65-a05e176bf53d@pengutronix.de> References: <20181018112615.29362-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20181018112615.29362-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20181028221123.GE1882@kunai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181028221123.GE1882@kunai> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Sascha Hauer , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, NXP Linux Team List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 28.10.18 23:11, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:26:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> At least on i.MX5x variants is DMA event for I2C muxed with SDHC. So >> it is project specific configuration and not an error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel > > So, the first patch is not I2C realm, and the second is dropped. No > comment about the third one? > > And is maybe someone from Pengutronix interested in maintaining this > driver? Uwe maybe? That would speed up things for it... Should i resend it as single patch?