From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jon Smirl" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: Introduce i2c listeners Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:55:06 -0400 Message-ID: <9e4733910806041155n7551ac74lf29c8a32163ec09a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080604201334.19636f30@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080604201334.19636f30-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: David Brownell , Linux I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 6/4/08, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch set demonstrates a new concept which I would like to add to > the i2c subsystem. It is named "i2c listeners" and is based on the > following structure: How does this fit in with the existing driver bus structure in kernel? This sounds a lot like hot plug and buses already implement hot plug events. This isn't exactly hot plug but it may be close enough that the existing bus APIs will work. Note that both devices and entire buses can be hot plugged with existing code. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c