From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jack Daniel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] i2c: davinci updates for 2.6.35 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:58:40 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: Kevin Hilman , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Jack Daniel = wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Ben Dooks wrot= e: >> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:42:12AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> This series of davinci I2C driver updates and fixes is targetted fo= r >>> 2.6.35. =A0It has been tested in davinci git on multiple davinci So= Cs. >>> >>> Ben, since these changes are isolated to the davinci driver only, i= f >>> you prefer I can merge them upstream along with my davinci changes = for >>> 2.6.35. >> >> I'll get them into -next when I rebase it. > >>Ben, this series never made it in for 2.6.35. > >>I've now rebased this against v2.6.35-rc3 and it's available here: > >> =A0 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davi= nci.git >>davinci-i2c > >>Please pull for 2.6.36. =A0Thanks. > >>Kevin > > Would like to know when this bug fix "i2c: davinci: Fix smbus Oops > with AIC33 usage" will be included? I can't find it in the 2.6.35-rc5 > of Linus tree. This has not made it to 2.6.35, pray tell what might be the reason for its non-inclusion? Your tree is still at 2.6.34-rc5, are you not taking any more patches? You did not reply to my previous mail, perhaps you did not like the fact that I use a forwarded mail ? This was because I did not subscribe to the i2c mailing list and had to copy the message. I know of no other way. Thanks and regards, Jack.