From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Mocean Laboratories <info@mocean-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] timberdale: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to drivers
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:00:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTin5ZdQ+i7e6O98jKux+V7Ncc5Kb3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=bCd_+f=EG-O=U5VH_ZNjFhxkziQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:20:31 +0200
>> Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Grant,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:05:22PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> [...]
>>> > Gah. Not all devices instantiated via mfd will be an mfd device,
>>> > which means that the driver may very well expect an *entirely
>>> > different* platform_device pointer; which further means a very high
>>> > potential of incorrectly dereferenced structures (as evidenced by a
>>> > patch series that is not bisectable). For instance, the xilinx ip
>>> > cores are used by more than just mfd.
>>> I agree. Since the vast majority of the MFD subdevices are MFD
>>> specific IPs, I overlooked that part. The impacted drivers are the
>>> timberdale and the DaVinci voice codec ones.
>
> Another option is you could do this for MFD devices:
>
> struct mfd_device {
> struct platform_devce pdev;
> struct mfd_cell *cell;
> };
>
> However, that requires that drivers using the mfd_cell will *never*
> get instantiated outside of the mfd infrastructure, and there is no
> way to protect against this so it is probably a bad idea.
>
> Or, mfd_cell could be added to platform_device directly which would
> *by far* be the safest option at the cost of every platform_device
> having a mostly unused mfd_cell pointer. Not a significant cost in my
> opinion.
>
> One last option is I'm prototyping a way to add type-safe structure
> pointers to a device, but that requires nasty CPP tricks and it's not
> complete yet. The cure might be worse than the disease here.
And yet another option is to create a mfd_bus_type, but that probably
isn't helpful since the one of the purposes of MFDs is that it is a
collection of non-detectable memory mapped devices that
platform_bus_type is intended to handle.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-01 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110202195417.228e2656@queued.net>
[not found] ` <20110202195417.228e2656-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-03 4:08 ` [PATCH 07/19] timberdale: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to drivers Andres Salomon
2011-03-31 23:05 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20110331230522.GI437-e0URQFbLeQY2iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-01 11:20 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-01 17:47 ` Andres Salomon
2011-04-01 17:56 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-01 18:00 ` Grant Likely [this message]
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=bCd_+f=EG-O=U5VH_ZNjFhxkziQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-01 23:52 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-01 23:58 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=bq=OGzXFp7qiBr7x_BnGOWf=DRQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-02 0:10 ` Andres Salomon
2011-04-04 10:03 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-05 3:04 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-06 15:23 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 15:58 ` Greg KH
2011-04-06 17:05 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 17:16 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-04-06 17:51 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 18:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-04-06 17:56 ` Greg KH
2011-04-06 18:25 ` Andres Salomon
2011-04-06 18:38 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20110406183854.GA10058-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-07 8:04 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-06 18:47 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 18:59 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20110406185902.GN25654-UiBtZHVXSwEVvW8u9ZQWYwjfymiNCTlR@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-06 22:09 ` Greg KH
2011-04-07 8:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-04-07 13:40 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-07 14:35 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20110407143515.GC26452-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-07 15:03 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-07 18:06 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-01 18:26 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTin5ZdQ+i7e6O98jKux+V7Ncc5Kb3Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=info@mocean-labs.com \
--cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).