From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda-koto5C5qi+TLoDKTGw+V6w@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Korsgaard
<peter.korsgaard-ob4gmnvZ1/cAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw-jW+XmwGofnusTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>,
Antti Palosaari <crope-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Frank Rowand
<frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
Daniel Baluta
<daniel.baluta-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Adriana Reus <adriana.reus@int>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/24] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:37:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZBEUC4DUmZci0MrXWzEBFXDR0bLN_taDuWR+mt6LMe-5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5700F648.1010804-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 03/04/16 09:52, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> From: Peter Rosin <peda-koto5C5qi+TLoDKTGw+V6w@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> The root i2c adapter lock is then no longer held by the i2c mux during
>> accesses behind the i2c gate, and such accesses need to take that lock
>> just like any other ordinary i2c accesses do.
>>
>> So, declare the i2c gate mux-locked, and zap the code that makes the
>> unlocked i2c accesses and just use ordinary regmap_write accesses.
>>
>> This also happens to fix the deadlock described in
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/584776/ authored by
>> Adriana Reus <adriana.reus-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> and submitted by
>> Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> ----------8<----------
>> iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Fix deadlock between i2c adapter lock and mpu lock
>>
>> This deadlock occurs if the accel/gyro and the sensor on the auxiliary
>> I2C (in my setup it's an ak8975) are working at the same time.
>>
>> Scenario:
>>
>> T1 T2
>> ==== ====
>> inv_mpu6050_read_fifo aux sensor op (eg. ak8975_read_raw)
>> | |
>> mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock) i2c_transfer
>> | |
>> i2c transaction i2c adapter lock
>> | |
>> i2c adapter lock i2c_mux_master_xfer
>> |
>> inv_mpu6050_select_bypass
>> |
>> mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock)
>>
>> When we operate on an mpu sensor the order of locking is mpu lock
>> followed by the i2c adapter lock. However, when we operate the auxiliary
>> sensor the order of locking is the other way around.
>>
>> ...
>> ----------8<----------
>>
>> The reason this patch fixes the deadlock is that T2 does not grab the
>> i2c adapter lock until the very end (and grabs the newfangled i2c mux
>> lock where it previously grabbed the i2c adapter lock).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda-koto5C5qi+TLoDKTGw+V6w@public.gmane.org>
> This one obviously wants a ack from Adriana or Daniel in addition to mine.
> I'm more than happy for these to go through the i2c tree btw.
>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology | 2 +-
>> drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c | 56 +++++++------------------------
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology
>> index 7a10edd0874f..346623a80bd1 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology
>> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ i2c-mux-pinctrl Normally parent-locked, mux-locked iff
>> i2c-mux-reg Parent-locked
>>
>> In drivers/iio/
>> -imu/inv_mpu6050/ Parent-locked
>> +imu/inv_mpu6050/ Mux-locked
>>
>> In drivers/media/
>> dvb-frontends/m88ds3103 Parent-locked
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
>> index 0d429d788106..71ad31a275c9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
>> @@ -24,45 +24,16 @@ static const struct regmap_config inv_mpu_regmap_config = {
>> .val_bits = 8,
>> };
>>
>> -/*
>> - * The i2c read/write needs to happen in unlocked mode. As the parent
>> - * adapter is common. If we use locked versions, it will fail as
>> - * the mux adapter will lock the parent i2c adapter, while calling
>> - * select/deselect functions.
>> - */
>> -static int inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(struct i2c_client *client,
>> - u8 reg, u8 d)
>> -{
>> - int ret;
>> - u8 buf[2] = {reg, d};
>> - struct i2c_msg msg[1] = {
>> - {
>> - .addr = client->addr,
>> - .flags = 0,
>> - .len = sizeof(buf),
>> - .buf = buf,
>> - }
>> - };
>> -
>> - ret = __i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, 1);
>> - if (ret != 1)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> static int inv_mpu6050_select_bypass(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan_id)
>> {
>> - struct i2c_client *client = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
>> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev);
>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
>> struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> /* Use the same mutex which was used everywhere to protect power-op */
>> mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>> if (!st->powerup_count) {
>> - ret = inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(client,
>> - st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1, 0);
>> + ret = regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1, 0);
>> if (ret)
>> goto write_error;
>>
>> @@ -71,10 +42,9 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_select_bypass(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan_id)
>> }
>> if (!ret) {
>> st->powerup_count++;
>> - ret = inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(client,
>> - st->reg->int_pin_cfg,
>> - INV_MPU6050_INT_PIN_CFG |
>> - INV_MPU6050_BIT_BYPASS_EN);
>> + ret = regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->int_pin_cfg,
>> + INV_MPU6050_INT_PIN_CFG |
>> + INV_MPU6050_BIT_BYPASS_EN);
>> }
>> write_error:
>> mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>> @@ -84,18 +54,16 @@ write_error:
>>
>> static int inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan_id)
>> {
>> - struct i2c_client *client = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
>> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev);
>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
>> struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>
>> mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>> /* It doesn't really mattter, if any of the calls fails */
>> - inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(client, st->reg->int_pin_cfg,
>> - INV_MPU6050_INT_PIN_CFG);
>> + regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->int_pin_cfg, INV_MPU6050_INT_PIN_CFG);
>> st->powerup_count--;
>> if (!st->powerup_count)
>> - inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(client, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1,
>> - INV_MPU6050_BIT_SLEEP);
>> + regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1,
>> + INV_MPU6050_BIT_SLEEP);
>> mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -133,15 +101,15 @@ static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> return result;
>>
>> st = iio_priv(dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev));
>> - st->muxc = i2c_mux_one_adapter(client->adapter, &client->dev, 0, 0,
>> - 0, 0, 0,
>> + st->muxc = i2c_mux_one_adapter(client->adapter, &client->dev, 0,
>> + I2C_MUX_LOCKED, 0, 0, 0,
>> inv_mpu6050_select_bypass,
>> inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass);
>> if (IS_ERR(st->muxc)) {
>> result = PTR_ERR(st->muxc);
>> goto out_unreg_device;
>> }
>> - st->muxc->priv = client;
>> + st->muxc->priv = dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev);
>>
>> result = inv_mpu_acpi_create_mux_client(client);
>> if (result)
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-03 8:52 [PATCH v6 00/24] i2c mux cleanup and locking update Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: convert to use an explicit i2c mux core Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] i2c: i2c-mux-pinctrl: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] i2c: i2c-arb-gpio-challenge: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] i2c: i2c-mux-pca9541: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] i2c: i2c-mux-pca954x: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] i2c: i2c-mux-reg: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: " Peter Rosin
[not found] ` <1459673574-11440-9-git-send-email-peda-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-03 10:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-04-03 11:51 ` Peter Rosin
[not found] ` <570103AE.1020707-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-10 14:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-04-19 15:58 ` Crestez Dan Leonard
2016-04-19 16:37 ` Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] [media] rtl2832: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] [media] si2168: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] [media] cx231xx: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] i2c-mux: drop old unused i2c-mux api Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] i2c: allow adapter drivers to override the adapter locking Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] i2c: muxes always lock the parent adapter Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] i2c-mux: relax locking of the top i2c adapter during mux-locked muxing Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] i2c-mux: document i2c muxes and elaborate on parent-/mux-locked muxes Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 11:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-04-05 7:50 ` Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 10:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <5700F648.1010804-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-18 7:37 ` Daniel Baluta [this message]
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] [media] si2168: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] [media] rtl2832: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] [media] rtl2832_sdr: get rid of empty regmap wrappers Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] [media] rtl2832: regmap is aware of lockdep, drop local locking hack Peter Rosin
[not found] ` <1459673574-11440-1-git-send-email-peda-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] i2c-mux: add common data for every i2c-mux instance Peter Rosin
2016-04-11 20:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-13 13:37 ` Peter Rosin
[not found] ` <570E4BAE.7060108-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-15 11:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] [media] m88ds3103: convert to use an explicit i2c mux core Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] [media] rtl2830: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-03 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] of/unittest: " Peter Rosin
2016-04-04 5:16 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-05 7:42 ` Peter Rosin
2016-04-11 12:39 ` [PATCH v6 00/24] i2c mux cleanup and locking update Wolfram Sang
2016-04-11 13:36 ` Peter Rosin
[not found] ` <570BA845.1060309-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-11 15:59 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEnQRZBEUC4DUmZci0MrXWzEBFXDR0bLN_taDuWR+mt6LMe-5w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.baluta-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=adriana.reus@int \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=crope-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jslaby-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peda-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peda-koto5C5qi+TLoDKTGw+V6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peter.korsgaard-ob4gmnvZ1/cAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pmeerw-jW+XmwGofnusTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).