From: Shubhrajyoti Datta <omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
tony@atomide.com, w.sang@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: re-factor omap_i2c_init function
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM=Q2cvO7T4S_efZuBub2EGMWLTK7tyUbhxJaJamv6yN8jNAkw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121023175706.GC32517@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:26:15PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
>> >> @@ -1268,23 +1271,8 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> >> {
>> >> struct omap_i2c_dev *_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> >>
>> >> - if (_dev->flags & OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE) {
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_PSC_REG, _dev->pscstate);
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLL_REG, _dev->scllstate);
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLH_REG, _dev->sclhstate);
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_BUF_REG, _dev->bufstate);
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG, _dev->syscstate);
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_WE_REG, _dev->westate);
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
>> >> - }
>> >> -
>> >> - /*
>> >> - * Don't write to this register if the IE state is 0 as it can
>> >> - * cause deadlock.
>> >> - */
>> >> - if (_dev->iestate)
>> >> - omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG, _dev->iestate);
>> >
>> > this part is not on __omap_i2c_init() so you're potentially causing a
>> > regression here.
>>
>> iestate is set at init so cannot be zero. so the check was removed.
>
Hmm thinking a little more, there is a case that I missed the resume
handler may get called before
the omap_i2c_init will restore the check and send another version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-23 15:27 [PATCH] i2c: omap: re-factor omap_i2c_init function Shubhrajyoti D
2012-10-23 17:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-23 17:56 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
[not found] ` <CAM=Q2cs-+O_BFrZFX4fuBooogEZiQO2Zxbm8W40vN9hmampLCA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-23 17:57 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20121023175706.GC32517-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-23 18:04 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-10-25 5:57 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta [this message]
[not found] ` <1351006039-24332-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-23 19:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-25 5:32 ` Shubhrajyoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM=Q2cvO7T4S_efZuBub2EGMWLTK7tyUbhxJaJamv6yN8jNAkw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).