Re: [PATCH 04/21] eeprom: at24: use SPDX identifier instead of GPL boiler-plate

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>]

2018-03-19 13:51 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>:
> On 2018-03-19 13:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2018-03-19 12:03 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>:
>>> Also, use a // style comment for the SPDX line in C files.
>>
>> I'm seeing both /* */ and // style comments used for SPDX headers - is
>> there any reason not to use /* */ here?
>
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst states:
>
> 2. Style:
>
>    The SPDX license identifier is added in form of a comment.  The comment
>    style depends on the file type::
>
>       C source: // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
>       C header: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
>       ASM:      /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
>       scripts:  # SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
>       .rst:     .. SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
>       .dts{i}:  // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
>
> Read more in that file for reasons. If there are none, I personally
> think the reason is that "Linus said so". Or something like that?
>
> Cheers,
> Peter

Makes sense, thanks.

I'm thinking about dropping this file from this series and submitting
it separately for Greg to Ack.

Unless he sees our exchange and acks it here. :)

Thanks,
Bart