From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: at24: Add address-width property Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:19:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1530078385-1546-1-git-send-email-alanx.chiang@intel.com> <1530078385-1546-2-git-send-email-alanx.chiang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1530078385-1546-2-git-send-email-alanx.chiang@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: alanx.chiang@intel.com Cc: linux-i2c , andy.yeh@intel.com, Sakari Ailus , Andy Shevchenko , andriy.shevchenko@intel.com, Rajmohan Mani , Andy Shevchenko , tfiga@chromium.org, jcliang@chromium.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org 2018-06-27 7:46 GMT+02:00 : > From: Alan Chiang > > The AT24 series chips use 8-bit address by default. If some > chips would like to support more than 8 bits, the at24 driver > should be added the compatible field for specfic chips. > > Provide a flexible way to determine the addressing bits through > address-width in this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Alan Chiang > Signed-off-by: Andy Yeh > > --- > since v1: > -- Remove the address-width field in the example. > since v2: > -- Remove redundant space. > > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt > index 61d833a..aededdb 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt > @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ Optional properties: > > - wp-gpios: GPIO to which the write-protect pin of the chip is connected. > > + - address-width: number of address bits (one of 8, 16). > + > Example: > > eeprom@52 { > -- > 2.7.4 > Rob, we only have two possibilities here and the default is 8 bits. What do you think about introducing a boolean property here called: 'address-width-16' instead of an integer? Best regards, Bartosz Golaszewski