From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] i2c: i2c-mxs: Let device core handle pinctrl Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 04:49:08 -0300 Message-ID: References: <1367863561-11534-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <1367863561-11534-3-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <20130608071521.GA3052@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130608071521.GA3052@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Fabio Estevam , shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Yes, with series like this, you really need a cover-letter and CC it to > all people involved. And mention there if you want these patches go via > a specific tree or each patch via the corresponding subsystem tree. And > mention if the patches are depending on each other. Otherwise I don't > really know what to do with these patches. Ok, understood, Wolfram. Please apply in your tree, if it looks good for you. Thanks, Fabio Estevam