From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/17] i2c: nomadik: Convert to devm functions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:50:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1392650418-14820-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20140218110109.GA18768@katana> <20140218184327.GF18768@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140218184327.GF18768@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Alessandro Rubini , Linus Walleij , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Mark Brown List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 18 February 2014 19:43, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> I added the IS_ERR, check as you suggested. That caused a rebase of >> the other patches as well. >> >> Sorry if it was unclear. > > No problem. I am about to apply all patches except 17 as you suggested. > It fails here, however, although I applied Linus' patch first. What > exactly is your base? Any chance to publish your branch? > I have several branches. :-) My patches applies on top 3.14-rc1 + Linus' patch. It also applies on "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-nomadik.git" on the i2c-nomadik, which already holds Linus's patch. This is what I thought was important due what's stated in the MAINATAINERS file. Now, I guess I should use your tree instead, "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git". Any particular branch I should use? Maybe it's also better if I just resend the patches in a new patchset, once I rebased them towards your tree? Kind regards Uffe